Literature DB >> 6295562

Amino acids as taste stimuli. II. Quality coding.

T C Pritchard, T R Scott.   

Abstract

Two experiments were performed in rats to evaluate the relative taste qualities of 12 L-amino acids, each at a concentration which evoked half the maximum response for that chemical. The first study involved recording the activity of 40 individual chorda tympani fibers to the stimulus series. Only 34% of the evoked responses resembled the short latency phasic-tonic activity which characterizes gustatory responses to inorganic salts and acids. 32% had latencies exceeding 1 s; another 27% consisted of only a phasic burst lasting less than 1 s. The remaining 7% were inhibitory. Both long latency and purely phasic activity were stimulus selective: 61% of the former were in response to Gly or Pro while 69% of the latter were evoked by Cys-HCl, Lys-HCl or His. Response inhibition was not associated with either specific fibers or stimuli. Thus amino acids, which to humans represent a class of perceptually complex stimuli, show a corresponding complexity of evoked neural properties in the rat. The second study employed a conditioned taste aversion paradigm to assess the qualitative similarity of each amino acid to the others and to the 4 prototypical taste stimuli; NaCl, HCl, quinine-HCl and sucrose. Some amino acids showed strong generalization to a single gustatory prototype (Pro and Gly to sucrose; Cys-HCl to HCl); others generalized well to multiple prototypes (e.g. Arg to sucrose and NaCl). Several showed poor generalization to all 4 prototypical tastes, calling into question the assumption that these 4 totally encompass the gustatory domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6295562     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90676-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  9 in total

Review 1.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

2.  Temperature systematically modifies neural activity for sweet taste.

Authors:  David M Wilson; Christian H Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The importance of the presence of a 5'-ribonucleotide and the contribution of the T1R1 + T1R3 heterodimer and an additional low-affinity receptor in the taste detection of L-glutamate as assessed psychophysically.

Authors:  Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Electrophysiological responses to sugars and amino acids in the nucleus of the solitary tract of type 1 taste receptor double-knockout mice.

Authors:  B Kalyanasundar; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector; Susan P Travers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Is glycine "sweet" to mice? Mouse strain differences in perception of glycine taste.

Authors:  Satoshi Manita; Alexander A Bachmanov; Xia Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Masashi Inoue
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

Review 7.  Genetics of Amino Acid Taste and Appetite.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; John I Glendinning; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Satoshi Manita; Stuart A McCaughey; Yuko Murata; Danielle R Reed; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Detection of maltodextrin and its discrimination from sucrose are independent of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer.

Authors:  Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 9.  The organization of taste sensibilities in hamster chorda tympani nerve fibers.

Authors:  M E Frank; S L Bieber; D V Smith
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.086

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.