Literature DB >> 21421543

Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Yada Treesukosol1, Clare M Mathes, Alan C Spector.   

Abstract

Evidence in the literature shows that in rodents, some taste-responsive neurons respond to both quinine and acid stimuli. Also, under certain circumstances, rodents display some degree of difficulty in discriminating quinine and acid stimuli. Here, C57BL/6J mice were trained and tested in a 2-response operant discrimination task. Mice had severe difficulty discriminating citric acid from quinine and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) with performance slightly, but significantly, above chance. In contrast, mice were able to competently discriminate sucrose from citric acid, NaCl, quinine, and PROP. In another experiment, mice that were conditioned to avoid quinine by pairings with LiCl injections subsequently suppressed licking responses to quinine and citric acid but not to NaCl or sucrose in a brief-access test, relative to NaCl-injected control animals. However, mice that were conditioned to avoid citric acid did not display cross-generalization to quinine. These mice significantly suppressed licking only to citric acid, and to a much lesser extent NaCl, compared with controls. Collectively, the findings from these experiments suggest that in mice, citric acid and quinine share chemosensory features making discrimination difficult but are not perceptually identical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421543      PMCID: PMC3094691          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  79 in total

1.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Breadth of tuning and taste coding in mammalian taste buds.

Authors:  Seth M Tomchik; Stephanie Berg; Joung Woul Kim; Nirupa Chaudhari; Stephen D Roper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  SW.B6-Soa(b) nontaster congenic strains completed and a sucrose octaacetate congenic quartet tested with other bitters.

Authors:  D B Harder; K S Gannon; G Whitney
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Taste in chimpanzees II: single chorda tympani fibers.

Authors:  G Hellekant; Y Ninomiya; V Danilova
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-06

5.  Sucrose vs. maltose taste discrimination by rats depends on the input of the seventh cranial nerve.

Authors:  A C Spector; S Markison; S J St John; M Garcea
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-04

6.  Primate sense of taste: behavioral and single chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerve fiber recordings in the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  G Hellekant; V Danilova; Y Ninomiya
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Taste responses of neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of awake rats: an extended stimulus array.

Authors:  K Nakamura; R Norgren
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Behavioral discrimination between sucrose and other natural sweeteners in mice: implications for the neural coding of T1R ligands.

Authors:  Cedrick D Dotson; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Comparison of L-monosodium glutamate and L-amino acid taste in rats.

Authors:  E R Delay; J D Mitzelfelt; A M Westburg; N Gross; B L Duran; B K Eschle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Ethanol consumption and taste preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cross-Generalization Profile to Orosensory Stimuli of Rats Conditioned to Avoid a High Fat/High Sugar Diet.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  A new gustometer for taste testing in rodents.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Ginger D Blonde; Ross P Henderson; Yada Treesukosol; Paul Hendrick; Ryan Newsome; Fred H Fletcher; Te Tang; James A Donaldson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Contribution of the TRPV1 channel to salt taste quality in mice as assessed by conditioned taste aversion generalization and chorda tympani nerve responses.

Authors:  Kimberly R Smith; Yada Treesukosol; A Brennan Paedae; Robert J Contreras; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.619

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.