Literature DB >> 15723792

The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception.

Bernd Bufe1, Paul A S Breslin, Christina Kuhn, Danielle R Reed, Christopher D Tharp, Jay P Slack, Un-Kyung Kim, Dennis Drayna, Wolfgang Meyerhof.   

Abstract

Individual differences in perception are ubiquitous within the chemical senses: taste, smell, and chemical somesthesis . A hypothesis of this fact states that polymorphisms in human sensory receptor genes could alter perception by coding for functionally distinct receptor types . We have previously reported evidence that sequence variants in a presumptive bitter receptor gene (hTAS2R38) correlate with differences in bitterness recognition of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) . Here, we map individual psychogenomic pathways for bitter taste by testing people with a variety of psychophysical tasks and linking their individual perceptions of the compounds PTC and propylthiouracil (PROP) to the in vitro responses of their TAS2R38 receptor variants. Functional expression studies demonstrate that five different haplotypes from the hTAS2R38 gene code for operatively distinct receptors. The responses of the three haplotypes we also tested in vivo correlate strongly with individuals' psychophysical bitter sensitivities to a family of compounds. These data provide a direct molecular link between heritable variability in bitter taste perception to functional variations of a single G protein coupled receptor that responds to compounds such as PTC and PROP that contain the N-C=S moiety. The molecular mechanisms of perceived bitterness variability have therapeutic implications, such as helping patients to consume beneficial bitter-tasting compounds-for example, pharmaceuticals and selected phytochemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723792      PMCID: PMC1400547          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  18 in total

Review 1.  The science and complexity of bitter taste.

Authors:  A Drewnowski
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Taste thresholds of further eighteen compounds and their correlation with P.T.C thresholds.

Authors:  N A BARNICOT; H HARRIS; H KALMUS
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-09

3.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil.

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Covariation in individuals' sensitivities to bitter compounds: evidence supporting multiple receptor/transduction mechanisms.

Authors:  J F Delwiche; Z Buletic; P A Breslin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

5.  The human TAS2R16 receptor mediates bitter taste in response to beta-glucopyranosides.

Authors:  Bernd Bufe; Thomas Hofmann; Dietmar Krautwurst; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Different noses for different people.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Orna Man; Doron Lancet; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Identification of ligands for two human bitter T2R receptors.

Authors:  Alexey N Pronin; Huixian Tang; Judy Connor; Walter Keung
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Natural selection and molecular evolution in PTC, a bitter-taste receptor gene.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding; Un-Kyung Kim; Michael J Bamshad; Jennifer Larsen; Lynn B Jorde; Dennis Drayna
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Andrew C Davidson; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; William C Speed; Andrew J Pakstis; Danielle R Reed; Derek J Snyder; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  222 in total

Review 1.  Bitter and sweet taste receptors in the respiratory epithelium in health and disease.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Modulation of bitter taste perception by a small molecule hTAS2R antagonist.

Authors:  Jay P Slack; Anne Brockhoff; Claudia Batram; Susann Menzel; Caroline Sonnabend; Stephan Born; Maria Mercedes Galindo; Susann Kohl; Sophie Thalmann; Liliana Ostopovici-Halip; Christopher T Simons; Ioana Ungureanu; Kees Duineveld; Cristian G Bologa; Maik Behrens; Stefan Furrer; Tudor I Oprea; Wolfgang Meyerhof
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Genetic variation in the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the "grassy" smelling odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol.

Authors:  Jeremy F McRae; Joel D Mainland; Sara R Jaeger; Kaylin A Adipietro; Hiroaki Matsunami; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Functional characterization of an allatotropin receptor expressed in the corpora allata of mosquitoes.

Authors:  Marcela Nouzova; Anne Brockhoff; Jaime G Mayoral; Marianne Goodwin; Wolfgang Meyerhof; Fernando G Noriega
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  A potential trigger for pine mouth: a case of a homozygous phenylthiocarbamide taster.

Authors:  Davide S Risso; Louisa Howard; Carter VanWaes; Dennis Drayna
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

7.  Bitter-Induced Salivary Proteins Increase Detection Threshold of Quinine, But Not Sucrose.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Kristen E Kay; Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

9.  Mouse nasal epithelial innate immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecules require taste signaling components.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Bei Chen; Kevin M Redding; Robert F Margolskee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Innate Immun       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.680

10.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.