Literature DB >> 15996693

Inbred mouse strain survey of sucrose intake.

Sarah R Lewis1, Sabrina Ahmed, Cheryl Dym, Eleonora Khaimova, Benjamin Kest, Richard J Bodnar.   

Abstract

Mouse strain differences for intake of sucrose and saccharin have been reported across studies, and some of these differences have been related to variants of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene. However, several methodological concerns remain, including use of relatively few strains and/or a limited number of palatable concentrations in previous analyses. The present study examined strain differences in sucrose intake among 11 inbred (A/J, AKR/J, BALB/cJ, CBA/J, C3H/HeJ, C57BL6/J, C57BL10/J, DBA/2J, SJL/J, SWR/J, 129P3/J) and one outbred (CD-1) mouse strains across nine different sucrose concentrations (0.0001-20%) using two-bottle 24-h preference tests which controlled for sucrose concentration presentation effects, sucrose and water bottle positions, and measurement of kilocalorie intake as sucrose or chow. A/J, C57BL/6J, CD-1 and SWR/J strains consumed the greatest (11.6-22 ml) amount of sucrose, whereas the A/J, C57BL/10J, SJL/J and SWR/J strains consumed the greatest (44-56%) percentages of kilocalories as sucrose. The AKR/J, CBA/J, C3H/HeJ and DBA/2J strains consumed the least (6.9-7.9 ml) amount of sucrose, and displayed lower (20-30%) percentages of kilocalories consumed as sucrose. Whereas A/J, C57BL/6J, C57BL/10J, CD-1, SWR/J and SJL/J strains all displayed the most pronounced compensatory decreases in chow intake as the percentage of kilocalories consumed as sucrose increased, the AKR/J, C3H/HeJ and DBA/2J strains failed to significantly alter chow intake even at high sucrose concentrations. There was a paucity of significant correlations in the percentage of sucrose intake between sucrose concentrations, but percentage of sucrose intake at lower concentrations did correlate with previous descriptions of saccharin intake and variants of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene. These data demonstrate clear mouse strain differences across a range of measures in sucrose intake across a wide range of concentrations, but caution against extrapolating between extremely high and low concentrations. The identification of strains with diverging abilities to regulate kilocalorie intake when presented with high sucrose concentrations may lead to the successful QTL mapping of this trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15996693     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  45 in total

1.  Administration of substances to laboratory animals: routes of administration and factors to consider.

Authors:  Patricia V Turner; Thea Brabb; Cynthia Pekow; Mary Ann Vasbinder
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Genetic control of oromotor phenotypes: A survey of licking and ingestive behaviors in highly diverse strains of mice.

Authors:  Steven J St John; Lu Lu; Robert W Williams; Jennifer Saputra; John D Boughter
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Variable Susceptibility to Cigarette Smoke-Induced Emphysema in 34 Inbred Strains of Mice Implicates Abi3bp in Emphysema Susceptibility.

Authors:  Josiah E Radder; Alyssa D Gregory; Adriana S Leme; Michael H Cho; Yanxia Chu; Neil J Kelly; Per Bakke; Amund Gulsvik; Augusto A Litonjua; David Sparrow; Terri H Beaty; James D Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Yingze Zhang; Annerose Berndt; Steven D Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 6.914

5.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

6.  BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.

Authors:  Tamar T Kraft; Donald Huang; Melanie Lolier; Deena Warshaw; Sam LaMagna; Elona Natanova; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17

7.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

8.  A technique for stereotaxic recordings of neuronal activity in awake, head-restrained mice.

Authors:  Jeri L Bryant; Snigdha Roy; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  Sucrose intake and fasting glucose levels in 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) receptor mutant mice.

Authors:  Anita J Bechtholt; Karen Smith; Stephanie Gaughan; Irwin Lucki
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.