Literature DB >> 15845881

Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.

Anthony Sclafani1, John I Glendinning.   

Abstract

C57BL/6J (B6) mice consume more sugar and fat solutions than do 129 mice in 24-h preference tests. Previous studies have attributed this observation to strain differences in taste responsiveness to these nutrients. We tested the hypothesis that differences in postingestive responsiveness contribute to the strain differences. In experiment 1, B6 and 129 mice were trained to associate consumption of a flavored solution (CS+) with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sucrose and a different flavored solution (CS-) with IG water infusions (22 h/day). They were then retrained with new flavors paired with IG infusions of 5.6% soybean oil and water. Although both strains developed preferences for the nutrient-paired CS+ solutions, the B6 mice displayed significantly stronger preferences. The B6 mice consumed more CS+ during training, which may have contributed to their enhanced preference. In a second experiment, training intakes were equated by giving B6 and 129 mice "isosweet" CS solutions prepared with different amounts of sucrose and saccharin. The B6 and 129 mice consumed more of the sugar- or fat-paired CS+ than the water-paired CS- during training. The two strains also displayed equally strong preferences for the CS+ over CS- in choice tests, indicating that they had similar postingestive responsiveness to the sucrose and soybean oil. We propose that B6 mice consume more sugar and fat than 129 mice because their stronger orosensory response stimulates greater intake, which leads to greater stimulation of postingestive nutrient detectors and further enhancement of consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15845881     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00176.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  64 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  A conditioned aversion study of sucrose and SC45647 taste in TRPM5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Meghan C Eddy; Benjamin K Eschle; Darlene Peterson; Nathan Lauras; Robert F Margolskee; Eugene R Delay
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Effects of CB1 and CRF1 receptor antagonists on binge-like eating in rats with limited access to a sweet fat diet: lack of withdrawal-like responses.

Authors:  Sarah L Parylak; Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Kenner C Rice; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-07-06

7.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

8.  Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-02-28

9.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

10.  Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Khalid Touzani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.