Literature DB >> 22673331

A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Joshua H Goldwyn1, Jay T Rubinstein, Eric Shea-Brown.   

Abstract

Model-based studies of responses of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation can provide insight into the functioning of cochlear implants. Ideally, these studies can identify limitations in sound processing strategies and lead to improved methods for providing sound information to cochlear implant users. To accomplish this, models must accurately describe spiking activity while avoiding excessive complexity that would preclude large-scale simulations of populations of auditory nerve fibers and obscure insight into the mechanisms that influence neural encoding of sound information. In this spirit, we develop a point process model of individual auditory nerve fibers that provides a compact and accurate description of neural responses to electric stimulation. Inspired by the framework of generalized linear models, the proposed model consists of a cascade of linear and nonlinear stages. We show how each of these stages can be associated with biophysical mechanisms and related to models of neuronal dynamics. Moreover, we derive a semianalytical procedure that uniquely determines each parameter in the model on the basis of fundamental statistics from recordings of single fiber responses to electric stimulation, including threshold, relative spread, jitter, and chronaxie. The model also accounts for refractory and summation effects that influence the responses of auditory nerve fibers to high pulse rate stimulation. Throughout, we compare model predictions to published physiological data of response to high and low pulse rate stimulation. We find that the model, although constructed to fit data from single and paired pulse experiments, can accurately predict responses to unmodulated and modulated pulse train stimuli. We close by performing an ideal observer analysis of simulated spike trains in response to sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli and find that carrier pulse rate does not affect modulation detection thresholds.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22673331      PMCID: PMC3544958          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00095.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  82 in total

1.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Eric Shea-Brown; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Simulation of the electrically stimulated cochlear neuron: modeling adaptation to trains of electric pulses.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Stochastic population model for electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Nikita S Imennov; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Dynamical instability determines the effect of ongoing noise on neural firing.

Authors:  David E O'Gorman; John A White; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-24

6.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

7.  Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Steven M Bierer; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A dynamical point process model of auditory nerve spiking in response to complex sounds.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Todd P Coleman; Jont Allen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  A phenomenological model of the synapse between the inner hair cell and auditory nerve: long-term adaptation with power-law dynamics.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

2.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Simulated auditory nerve axon demyelination alters sensitivity and response timing to extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; Gabrielle E O'Brien; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Computational Modeling of Synchrony in the Auditory Nerve in Response to Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.387

5.  The neuronal response at extended timescales: a linearized spiking input-output relation.

Authors:  Daniel Soudry; Ron Meir
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  A Phenomenological Model of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber: Temporal and Biphasic Response Properties.

Authors:  Colin D F Horne; Christian J Sumner; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  A Model of Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses with Peripheral and Central Sites of Spike Generation.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-04

8.  A Phenomenological Model Reproducing Temporal Response Characteristics of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.

Authors:  Marko Takanen; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.