Literature DB >> 3624083

Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.

C van den Honert, P H Stypulkowski.   

Abstract

Spatial maps of electrical excitation were constructed by comparing electrical threshold with acoustic CF for large populations of auditory nerve fibers in cats. Thresholds among fibers with the same CF varied by factors of 4 or more. Monopolar electrodes, both intracochlear and extracochlear, excited fibers throughout the cochlea without spatial selectivity. Stimulation with intracochlear bipolar electrodes produced a minimum in the threshold distribution adjacent to the electrodes. With longitudinally oriented pairs, the width, depth, and location of the minimum shifted with stimulus polarity; spread of excitation throughout the cochlea occurred with stimulus intensities 6.2 to 14 dB above the lowest threshold. With radially oriented pairs, minima were sharper and deeper; spread of excitation occurred at intensities 23.7 to 32.8 dB above the minimum threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3624083     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90167-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  39 in total

1.  Spatial extent of cochlear infrared neural stimulation determined by tone-on-light masking.

Authors:  Agnella Izzo Matic; Joseph T Walsh; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Monopolar intracochlear pulse trains selectively activate the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Matthew C Schoenecker; Ben H Bonham; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-22

Review 3.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

4.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

5.  Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-17

6.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Optical parameter variability in laser nerve stimulation: a study of pulse duration, repetition rate, and wavelength.

Authors:  Agnella D Izzo; Joseph T Walsh; E Duco Jansen; Mark Bendett; Jim Webb; Heather Ralph; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Pulsed laser versus electrical energy for peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Jonathon Wells; Peter Konrad; Chris Kao; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to interaural time differences in the envelope versus the fine structure with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.