Literature DB >> 6480511

Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings.

C van den Honert, P H Stypulkowski.   

Abstract

Single fiber recordings from the electrically stimulated auditory nerve yield post-stimulus time (PST) histograms demonstrating several response patterns. With pulsatile stimulation of the cochlea, the PST histogram for most fibers at threshold consists of a long-latency (500-800 microseconds), broad response peak with significant latency variability. At increased stimulus intensities, the response pattern changes to a short-latency (300-500 microseconds), high-synchrony peak. In preparations where stimulation is applied directly to the axons of the auditory nerve, the response pattern consists solely of a short-latency, high-synchrony peak. It is postulated that threshold excitation of normal auditory neurons occurs on the dendritic processes. At higher stimulus intensities, the site of excitation appears to shift to the axonal region of the cells. Two additional response patterns to electrical stimulation which are attributed to synaptic excitation of the auditory neurons via the hair cells are described.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6480511     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90052-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  57 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

3.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-15

8.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  A behavioral method to estimate charge integration efficiency in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.