Literature DB >> 20632064

Changes in auditory nerve responses across the duration of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated electric pulse-train stimuli.

Ning Hu1, Charles A Miller, Paul J Abbas, Barbara K Robinson, Jihwan Woo.   

Abstract

Response rates of auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) to electric pulse trains change over time, reflecting substantial spike-rate adaptation that depends on stimulus parameters. We hypothesize that adaptation affects the representation of amplitude-modulated pulse trains used by cochlear prostheses to transmit speech information to the auditory system. We recorded cat ANF responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) trains with 5,000 pulse/s carriers. Stimuli delivered by a monopolar intracochlear electrode had fixed modulation frequency (100 Hz) and depth (10%). ANF responses were assessed by spike-rate measures, while representation of modulation was evaluated by vector strength (VS) and the fundamental component of the fast Fourier transform (F(0) amplitude). These measures were assessed across the 400 ms duration of pulse-train stimuli, a duration relevant to speech stimuli. Different stimulus levels were explored and responses were categorized into four spike-rate groups to assess level effects across ANFs. The temporal pattern of rate adaptation to modulated trains was similar to that of unmodulated trains, but with less rate adaptation. VS to the modulator increased over time and tended to saturate at lower spike rates, while F(0) amplitude typically decreased over time for low driven rates and increased for higher driven rates. VS at moderate and high spike rates and degree of F(0) amplitude temporal changes at low and moderate spike rates were positively correlated with the degree of rate adaptation. Thus, high-rate carriers will modify the ANF representation of the modulator over time. As the VS and F(0) measures were sensitive to adaptation-related changes over different spike-rate ranges, there is value in assessing both measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632064      PMCID: PMC2975883          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0225-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  22 in total

1.  Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; B K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-09

2.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Responses of auditory nerve fibers to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Heidi Guzik; Hongzhe Li; Jennifer Henderson Sabes
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; E C Moxon
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; P B Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  R Hartmann; G Topp; R Klinke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings.

Authors:  C van den Honert; P H Stypulkowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of nonlinearities on speech encoding in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  E D Young; M B Sachs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12

4.  Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Unrelated to the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.

Authors:  Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez; Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Detection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: behavioral results and computational modeling.

Authors:  Nikita S Imennov; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Chloe Vaughan; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; Angela Pellittieri; Brittney L Carter; Curtis J Stegman; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.