Literature DB >> 2808146

Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys.

C W Parkins1.   

Abstract

Electroneural response patterns of single auditory-nerve neurons were studied in aminoglycoside-deafened squirrel monkeys. The electrical stimuli were delivered through bipolar electrodes implanted in the scala tympani. The effects of pulse width, shape, frequency, and intensity on neural adaptation, phase locking, and spectral content were evaluated. Our results did not demonstrate the characteristic adaptation seen in auditory-nerve neurons in response to acoustic stimulation. Phase locking to a broad stimulus pulse (3200 microseconds/phase) was found to a very restricted phase angle of the electrical stimulus which was broader for square wave than for sine wave stimulation. The latency of the phase locked response varied inversely with stimulus intensity with greater variation for square wave stimulation than for sine wave stimulation. Auditory neurons were capable of a very high degree of phase locking to a 200-microseconds/phase pulse presented at 156 pulses per second (PPS) and to the first pulse of a 2500-Hz pulse burst. Phase locking was much poorer for the subsequent 200-microseconds/phase pulses comprising the 2500-Hz pulse burst where the neuron's response was determined by its relative recovery status. These findings can be explained by an interaction between the neuron's relative refractory status and its integration of charge over the stimulatory half cycle of the electrical stimulus. These two factors also appear to determine the interspike interval of the neural response. This interval decreased monotonically with increasing stimulus intensity. The neural spike rate (150-500 Hz) producing this interval increased with intensity and may be a source of periodicity information which the central auditory nervous system could interpret as pitch. This may account for the proportional relationship between pitch and stimulus intensity seen in some cochlear implant patients. Our study demonstrates that auditory-nerve neurons comply with basic neurophysiological principles in their responses to electrical stimulation. These principles should be incorporated into the cochlear prosthesis stimulator if more normal neural response patterns are desired in the cochlear prosthesis patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808146     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90007-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

2.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tonotopic distribution of short-term adaptation properties in the cochlear nerve of normal and acoustically overexposed chicks.

Authors:  Mark A Crumling; James C Saunders
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-03

5.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

8.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

10.  Topography of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats after neonatal deafness and electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Gary T Hradek; Ben H Bonham; Russell L Snyder
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.