Literature DB >> 3436853

Auditory-nerve single-neuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes.

C W Parkins1, J Colombo.   

Abstract

Single auditory-nerve neuron thresholds were studied in sensory-deafened squirrel monkeys to determine the effects of electrical stimulus shape and frequency on single-neuron thresholds. Frequency was separated into its components, pulse width and pulse rate, which were analyzed separately. Square and sinusoidal pulse shapes were compared. There were no or questionably significant threshold differences in charge per phase between sinusoidal and square pulses of the same pulse width. There was a small (less than 0.5 dB) but significant threshold advantage for 200 microseconds/phase pulses delivered at low pulse rates (156 pps) compared to higher pulse rates (625 pps and 2500 pps). Pulse width was demonstrated to be the prime determinant of single-neuron threshold, resulting in strength-duration curves similar to other mammalian myelinated neurons, but with longer chronaxies. The most efficient electrical stimulus pulse width to use for cochlear implant stimulation was determined to be 100 microseconds/phase. This pulse width delivers the lowest charge/phase at threshold. The single-neuron strength-duration curves were compared to strength-duration curves of a computer model based on the specific anatomy of auditory-nerve neurons. The membrane capacitance and resulting chronaxie of the model can be varied by altering the length of the unmyelinated termination of the neuron, representing the unmyelinated portion of the neuron between the habenula perforata and the hair cell. This unmyelinated segment of the auditory-nerve neuron may be subject to aminoglycoside damage. Simulating a 10 micron unmyelinated termination for this model neuron produces a strength-duration curve that closely fits the single-neuron data obtained from aminoglycoside deafened animals. Both the model and the single-neuron strength-duration curves differ significantly from behavioral threshold data obtained from monkeys and humans with cochlear implants. This discrepancy can best be explained by the involvement of higher level neurologic processes in the behavioral responses. These findings suggest that the basic principles of neural membrane function must be considered in developing or analyzing electrical stimulation strategies for cochlear prostheses if the appropriate stimulation of frequency specific populations of auditory-nerve neurons is the objective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3436853     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90196-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  16 in total

1.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

3.  Analytical theory for extracellular electrical stimulation of nerve with focal electrodes. II. Passive myelinated axon.

Authors:  J T Rubinstein
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Erika H van der Veen; Randy K Kalkman; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-22

5.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

6.  Recommendations for Measuring the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Jianfen Luo; Lei Xu; Holly F B Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin D Brown; Michelle Shannon; Cynthia Warner; Angela Pellittieri; William J Riggs
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Guitierrez; Leonie M Fewster; John M Heasman; Colette M McKay; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  Philip D Littlefield; Irena Vujanovic; Jagmeet Mundi; Agnella Izzo Matic; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.