Literature DB >> 20177761

Encoding and decoding amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli--a point process analysis.

Joshua H Goldwyn1, Eric Shea-Brown, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant speech processors stimulate the auditory nerve by delivering amplitude-modulated electrical pulse trains to intracochlear electrodes. Studying how auditory nerve cells encode modulation information is of fundamental importance, therefore, to understanding cochlear implant function and improving speech perception in cochlear implant users. In this paper, we analyze simulated responses of the auditory nerve to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant stimuli using a point process model. First, we quantify the information encoded in the spike trains by testing an ideal observer's ability to detect amplitude modulation in a two-alternative forced-choice task. We vary the amount of information available to the observer to probe how spike timing and averaged firing rate encode modulation. Second, we construct a neural decoding method that predicts several qualitative trends observed in psychophysical tests of amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant listeners. We find that modulation information is primarily available in the sequence of spike times. The performance of an ideal observer, however, is inconsistent with observed trends in psychophysical data. Using a neural decoding method that jitters spike times to degrade its temporal resolution and then computes a common measure of phase locking from spike trains of a heterogeneous population of model nerve cells, we predict the correct qualitative dependence of modulation detection thresholds on modulation frequency and stimulus level. The decoder does not predict the observed loss of modulation sensitivity at high carrier pulse rates, but this framework can be applied to future models that better represent auditory nerve responses to high carrier pulse rate stimuli. The supplemental material of this article contains the article's data in an active, re-usable format.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20177761      PMCID: PMC2898280          DOI: 10.1007/s10827-010-0224-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  49 in total

1.  Predictions of psychophysical measurements for sinusoidal amplitude modulated (SAM) pulse-train stimuli from a stochastic model.

Authors:  Yifang Xu; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

3.  Simulation of the electrically stimulated cochlear neuron: modeling adaptation to trains of electric pulses.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 4. model development at low pulse rates: general model and application to individuals.

Authors:  Lawrence T Cohen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  9 in total

1.  Ability of primary auditory cortical neurons to detect amplitude modulation with rate and temporal codes: neurometric analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Pingbo Yin; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Resolving molecular contributions of ion channel noise to interspike interval variability through stochastic shielding.

Authors:  Shusen Pu; Peter J Thomas
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Simulated auditory nerve axon demyelination alters sensitivity and response timing to extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; Gabrielle E O'Brien; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A Model of Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses with Peripheral and Central Sites of Spike Generation.

Authors:  Suyash Narendra Joshi; Torsten Dau; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-04

9.  Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Rosy V Southwell; John M Deeks; Richard E Turner; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.