Literature DB >> 18339428

A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Leon F Heffer1, James B Fallon.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulus artifact corrupting electrophysiological recordings often makes the subsequent analysis of the underlying neural response difficult. This is particularly evident when investigating short-latency neural activity in response to high-rate electrical stimulation. We developed and evaluated an off-line technique for the removal of stimulus artifact from electrophysiological recordings. Pulsatile electrical stimulation was presented at rates of up to 5000 pulses/s during extracellular recordings of guinea pig auditory nerve fibers. Stimulus artifact was removed by replacing the sample points at each stimulus artifact event with values interpolated along a straight line, computed from neighbouring sample points. This technique required only that artifact events be identifiable and that the artifact duration remained less than both the inter-stimulus interval and the time course of the action potential. We have demonstrated that this computationally efficient sample-and-interpolate technique removes the stimulus artifact with minimal distortion of the action potential waveform. We suggest that this technique may have potential applications in a range of electrophysiological recording systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18339428      PMCID: PMC2396946          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  17 in total

1.  A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments.

Authors:  T Wichmann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Takao Hashimoto; Christopher M Elder; Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm.

Authors:  D T O'Keeffe; G M Lyons; A E Donnelly; C A Byrne
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting.

Authors:  Daniel A Wagenaar; Steve M Potter
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Spectral cancellation of microstimulation artifact for simultaneous neural recording in situ.

Authors:  James W Gnadt; Stanley D Echols; Abidin Yildirim; Honglei Zhang; Kush Paul
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-12

8.  An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor.

Authors:  J A Freeman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-08

9.  Intracochlear electrical stimulation of normal and deaf cats investigated using brainstem response audiometry.

Authors:  R C Black; G M Clark; S J O'Leary; C Walters
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1983

10.  On the nature and elimination of stimulus artifact in nerve signals evoked and recorded using surface electrodes.

Authors:  K C McGill; K L Cummins; L J Dorfman; B B Berlizot; K Leutkemeyer; D G Nishimura; B Widrow
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  30 in total

1.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Brian D Buechel; Woongsang Sunwoo; Joseph D Wagner; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

3.  A novel device to suppress electrical stimulus artifacts in electrophysiological experiments.

Authors:  Thomas Wichmann; Annaelle Devergnas
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Temporal Envelope Coding by Inferior Colliculus Neurons with Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Martin F McKinney; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-17

5.  Mixed-signal template-based reduction scheme for stimulus artifact removal in electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Thi Kim Thoa Nguyen; Silke Musa; Wolfgang Eberle; Carmen Bartic; Georges Gielen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Congenital and prolonged adult-onset deafness cause distinct degradations in neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-05

7.  Effect of current focusing on the sensitivity of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated stimulation.

Authors:  Shefin S George; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Optical pacing of the adult rabbit heart.

Authors:  Michael W Jenkins; Y T Wang; Y Q Doughman; M Watanabe; Y Cheng; A M Rollins
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Neural Coding of Interaural Time Differences with Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Unanesthetized Rabbits.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Kenneth E Hancock; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.