Literature DB >> 17301847

Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Raymond A Applegate1, William J Donnelly, Jason D Marsack, Darren E Koenig, Konrad Pesudovs.   

Abstract

We report root-mean-square (RMS) wavefront error (WFE) for individual aberrations and cumulative high-order (HO) RMS WFE for the normal human eye as a function of age by decade and pupil diameter in 1 mm steps from 3 to 7 mm and determine the relationship among HO RMS WFE, mean age for each decade of life, and luminance for physiologic pupil diameters. Subjects included 146 healthy individuals from 20 to 80 years of age. Ocular aberration was measured on the preferred eye of each subject (for a total of 146 eyes through dilated pupils; computed for 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 mm pupils; and described with a tenth-radial-order normalized Zernike expansion. We found that HO RMS WFE increases faster with increasing pupil diameter for any given age and pupil diameter than it does with increasing age alone. A planar function accounts for 99% of the variance in the 3-D space defined by mean log HO RMS WFE, mean age for each decade of life, and pupil diameter. When physiologic pupil diameters are used to estimate HO RMS WFE as a function of luminance and age, at low luminance (9 cd/m2) HO RMS WFE decreases with increasing age. This normative data set details (1) the 3-D relationship between HO RMS WFE and age for fixed pupil diameters and (2) the 3-D relationship among HO RMS WFE, age, and luminance for physiologic pupil diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17301847      PMCID: PMC2083284          DOI: 10.1364/josaa.24.000578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  53 in total

1.  Optical aberrations of the human cornea as a function of age.

Authors:  A Guirao; M Redondo; P Artal
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Pupil location under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

Authors:  Yabo Yang; Keith Thompson; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Scaling Zernike expansion coefficients to different pupil sizes.

Authors:  Jim Schwiegerling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Measurement of the spatial shift of the pupil center.

Authors:  Massimo Camellin; Federico Gambino; Stefano Casaro
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Optical density of the human lens.

Authors:  J Xu; J Pokorny; V C Smith
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Analysis of intraocular straylight, especially in relation to age.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The refraction of the eye in the relation to spherical aberration and pupil size.

Authors:  W N Charman; J A Jennings; H Whitefoot
Journal:  Br J Physiol Opt       Date:  1978

9.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Measuring visual acuity--mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters?

Authors:  Konrad Pesudovs; Jason D Marsack; William J Donnelly; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of sex differences in presbyopia.

Authors:  Adam Hickenbotham; Austin Roorda; Craig Steinmaus; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part II: examples].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Samuel H Jarvis; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Persistent troublesome floaters necessitating the explantation of XtraFocus Pinhole IOL (Morcher).

Authors:  Prateek Agarwal; Samuel Edward Navon
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-08

6.  Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.

Authors:  Mylan T Nguyen; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Comparison of spherical aberration and small-pupil profiles in improving depth of focus for presbyopic corrections.

Authors:  Adam Hickenbotham; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Influence of simple myopic against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Toshiya Yamamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Simone Beheregaray; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.