Literature DB >> 24998946

Influence of simple myopic against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with monofocal intraocular lenses.

Toshiya Yamamoto1, Takahiro Hiraoka, Simone Beheregaray, Tetsuro Oshika.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the influence of simple myopic against-the-rule (ATR) and with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism on uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in eyes after monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
METHODS: Patients with a postoperative spherical refractive error within ±0.5 diopter (D) and a negative cylindrical refractive error ≥0.5 D were enrolled and divided into two groups: ATR or WTR astigmatism. Age, pupil size, spherical equivalent refractive error, spherical refractive error, cylindrical refractive power, UDVA, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and ocular wavefront aberrations were compared between groups. Correlations between UDVA and other parameters were also examined within groups.
RESULTS: Twenty-five eyes (25 patients) with ATR astigmatism and 18 eyes (18 patients) with WTR astigmatism were evaluated. The logMAR UDVA was 0.30 ± 0.22 (mean ± SD) in the ATR group and 0.11 ± 0.15 in the WTR group, showing a significant difference between groups (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in other parameters between groups. The UDVA was significantly correlated with spherical equivalent refractive error (r = -0.51, P < 0.01) and cylindrical refractive power (r = -0.48, P = 0.01) in the ATR group, but not in the WTR group. No other parameters were significantly correlated with UDVA in either group.
CONCLUSION: After monofocal IOL implantation, UDVA in eyes with simple myopic ATR astigmatism was worse than in eyes with simple myopic WTR astigmatism. Additionally, UDVA was significantly influenced by cylindrical refractive power in eyes with ATR astigmatism, but not in eyes with WTR astigmatism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24998946     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-014-0337-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  43 in total

1.  Inattention to nonsuperimposable midline symmetry causes wavefront analysis error.

Authors:  Michael K Smolek; Stephen D Klyce; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04

2.  Subjective blur limits for cylinder.

Authors:  Huanqing Guo; David A Atchison
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Authors:  M Nakazawa; K Ohtsuki
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings.

Authors:  F W Campbell; J J Kulikowski; J Levinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Vector analysis of astigmatic changes after cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; David P Piñero; Javier Tomás; Alicia Alesón
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Ryo Kosaki; Naoyuki Maeda; Kenichiro Bessho; Yuichi Hori; Kohji Nishida; Asaki Suzaki; Yoko Hirohara; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takashi Fujikado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Optimal astigmatism to enhance depth of focus after cataract surgery.

Authors:  M R Sawusch; D L Guyton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis.

Authors:  M Nakazawa; K Ohtsuki
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Effect of pupil size on uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes with astigmatism.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Watanabe; Kazuno Negishi; Murat Dogru; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Hidemasa Torii; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Type of residual astigmatism and uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  Yumi Hasegawa; Masato Honbo; Kazunori Miyata; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Comparison of corneal irregular astigmatism by the type of corneal regular astigmatism.

Authors:  Yuta Ueno; Risa Nomura; Takahiro Hiraoka; Katsuhito Kinoshita; Mutsuko Ohara; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.