Literature DB >> 24281244

Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Ayeswarya Ravikumar1, Jason D Marsack, Harold E Bedell, Yue Shi, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

We determined the degree to which change in visual acuity (VA) correlates with change in optical quality using image-quality (IQ) metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors (WFEs). VA was recorded for five normal subjects reading simulated, logMAR acuity charts generated from the scaled WFEs of 15 normal and seven keratoconic eyes. We examined the correlations over a large range of acuity loss (up to 11 lines) and a smaller, more clinically relevant range (up to four lines). Nine IQ metrics were well correlated for both ranges. Over the smaller range of primary interest, eight were also accurate and precise in estimating the variations in logMAR acuity in both normal and keratoconic WFEs. The accuracy for these eight best metrics in estimating the mean change in logMAR acuity ranged between ±0.0065 to ±0.017 logMAR (all less than one letter), and the precision ranged between ±0.10 to ±0.14 logMAR (all less than seven letters).

Keywords:  image quality; image-quality metrics; normal and keratoconic wavefront errors; visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24281244      PMCID: PMC3842080          DOI: 10.1167/13.13.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  61 in total

1.  Optical aberrations of the human cornea as a function of age.

Authors:  A Guirao; M Redondo; P Artal
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options.

Authors:  A Carkeet
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Blur adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  Sini George; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Phase plates for wave-aberration compensation in the human eye.

Authors:  R Navarro; E Moreno-Barriuso; S Bará; T Mancebo
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Effects of spherical and astigmatic defocus on acuity and contrast sensitivity: a comparison of three clinical charts.

Authors:  A Bradley; T Thomas; M Kalaher; M Hoerres
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Generation of third-order spherical and coma aberrations by use of radically symmetrical fourth-order lenses.

Authors:  N López-Gil; H C Howland; B Howland; N Charman; R Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Dependence of subjective image focus on the magnitude and pattern of high order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Pablo de Gracia; Maria Vinas; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Improving vision by pupil masking.

Authors:  Sergio Bonaque-González; Susana Ríos-Rodríguez; Norberto López-Gil
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Binocular cross-correlation analyses of the effects of high-order aberrations on the stereoacuity of eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Austin Roorda; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Tiffanie T Yu; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability.

Authors:  Anita Ticak; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Yue Shi; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.018

4.  Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Kelsie B Morrison; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Alexander W Schill; Chuan Hu; Daniel R Coates; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Jos J Rozema; Gareth D Hastings; Marta Jiménez-García; Carina Koppen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Chi Nguyen; Anita Ticak; Darren E Koenig; James D Elswick; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Image Quality Metric Derived Refractions Predicted to Improve Visual Acuity Beyond Habitual Refraction for Patients With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Julianna Z Zanayed; Lan Chi Nguyen; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.106

10.  A Randomized Trial of Objective Spectacle Prescriptions for Adults with Down Syndrome: Baseline Data and Methods.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack; Ruth E Manny; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Karen D Fern; Kelsey R Trast
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.