PURPOSE: To examine whether custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses provide visual and optical performance equivalent to habitual gas permeable (GP) corrections in three keratoconus subjects. METHODS: Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses were produced and evaluated at the Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston for three habitual GP-wearing keratoconus subjects. Photopic high and mesopic low contrast logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA) and residual second to tenth order optical aberrations experienced with these custom soft lenses were recorded and compared with the subjects' habitual GP correction. RESULTS: All three subjects wearing custom soft lenses reached the established exit criterion of photopic high contrast (HC) logMAR VA equal to or better than values recorded with their habitual GP lens. HC logMAR VA for GP and custom soft lens correction was 0.01 +/- 0.05 and 0.00 +/- 0.02 for KC1, 0.20 +/- 0.02 and 0.14 +/- 0.02 for KC2, and 0.04 +/- 0.09 and -0.05 +/- 0.05 for KC3, respectively. In addition, KC2 reached the exit criterion of high-order aberration levels equal to or less than values with their habitual GP lens (GP lens: 0.394 +/- 0.024 microm, custom lens: 0.381 +/- 0.074 microm). CONCLUSIONS: Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses have been demonstrated to provide equivalent photopic HC logMAR VA to that achieved with habitual GP correction in three keratoconus subjects. Future emphasis will be placed on surpassing habitual GP performance and reaching a normal age-matched criterion for both VA and aberration measures. Achieving these goals may require a more thorough understanding of the relationship between visual performance and residual aberration experienced during custom lens wear through the use of image quality metrics predictive of visual performance.
PURPOSE: To examine whether custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses provide visual and optical performance equivalent to habitual gas permeable (GP) corrections in three keratoconus subjects. METHODS: Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses were produced and evaluated at the Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston for three habitual GP-wearing keratoconus subjects. Photopic high and mesopic low contrast logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA) and residual second to tenth order optical aberrations experienced with these custom soft lenses were recorded and compared with the subjects' habitual GP correction. RESULTS: All three subjects wearing custom soft lenses reached the established exit criterion of photopic high contrast (HC) logMAR VA equal to or better than values recorded with their habitual GP lens. HC logMAR VA for GP and custom soft lens correction was 0.01 +/- 0.05 and 0.00 +/- 0.02 for KC1, 0.20 +/- 0.02 and 0.14 +/- 0.02 for KC2, and 0.04 +/- 0.09 and -0.05 +/- 0.05 for KC3, respectively. In addition, KC2 reached the exit criterion of high-order aberration levels equal to or less than values with their habitual GP lens (GP lens: 0.394 +/- 0.024 microm, custom lens: 0.381 +/- 0.074 microm). CONCLUSIONS: Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses have been demonstrated to provide equivalent photopic HC logMAR VA to that achieved with habitual GP correction in three keratoconus subjects. Future emphasis will be placed on surpassing habitual GP performance and reaching a normal age-matched criterion for both VA and aberration measures. Achieving these goals may require a more thorough understanding of the relationship between visual performance and residual aberration experienced during custom lens wear through the use of image quality metrics predictive of visual performance.
Authors: Raymond A Applegate; Charles Ballentine; Hillery Gross; Edwin J Sarver; Charlene A Sarver Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Norberto López-Gil; José Francisco Castejón-Mochón; Antonio Benito; José María Marín; George Lo-a-Foe; Gildas Marin; Bruno Fermigier; Dominique Renard; Denis Joyeux; Nicolas Château; Pablo Artal Journal: J Refract Surg Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate Journal: J Vis Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 2.240
Authors: Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Chi Nguyen; Anita Ticak; Darren E Koenig; James D Elswick; Raymond A Applegate Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 1.973