Literature DB >> 19050464

Performance of wavefront-guided soft lenses in three keratoconus subjects.

Jason D Marsack1, Katrina E Parker, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine whether custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses provide visual and optical performance equivalent to habitual gas permeable (GP) corrections in three keratoconus subjects.
METHODS: Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses were produced and evaluated at the Visual Optics Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston for three habitual GP-wearing keratoconus subjects. Photopic high and mesopic low contrast logarithm of minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (logMAR VA) and residual second to tenth order optical aberrations experienced with these custom soft lenses were recorded and compared with the subjects' habitual GP correction.
RESULTS: All three subjects wearing custom soft lenses reached the established exit criterion of photopic high contrast (HC) logMAR VA equal to or better than values recorded with their habitual GP lens. HC logMAR VA for GP and custom soft lens correction was 0.01 +/- 0.05 and 0.00 +/- 0.02 for KC1, 0.20 +/- 0.02 and 0.14 +/- 0.02 for KC2, and 0.04 +/- 0.09 and -0.05 +/- 0.05 for KC3, respectively. In addition, KC2 reached the exit criterion of high-order aberration levels equal to or less than values with their habitual GP lens (GP lens: 0.394 +/- 0.024 microm, custom lens: 0.381 +/- 0.074 microm).
CONCLUSIONS: Custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses have been demonstrated to provide equivalent photopic HC logMAR VA to that achieved with habitual GP correction in three keratoconus subjects. Future emphasis will be placed on surpassing habitual GP performance and reaching a normal age-matched criterion for both VA and aberration measures. Achieving these goals may require a more thorough understanding of the relationship between visual performance and residual aberration experienced during custom lens wear through the use of image quality metrics predictive of visual performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050464      PMCID: PMC2614306          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818e8eaa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  25 in total

1.  Method for optimizing the correction of the eye's higher-order aberrations in the presence of decentrations.

Authors:  Antonio Guirao; Ian G Cox; David R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Charles Ballentine; Hillery Gross; Edwin J Sarver; Charlene A Sarver
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Applying wavefront sensors and corneal topography to keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason Marsack; Thomas Milner; Grady Rylander; Norman Leach; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Design principles and limitations of wave-front guided contact lenses.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack; Roberto Ramos; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Calculated impact of higher-order monochromatic aberrations on retinal image quality in a population of human eyes.

Authors:  Antonio Guirao; Jason Porter; David R Williams; Ian G Cox
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  On-eye performance of custom wavefront-guided soft contact lenses in a habitual soft lens-wearing keratoconic patient.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Katrina E Parker; Yafei Niu; Konrad Pesudovs; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye.

Authors:  D Williams; G Y Yoon; J Porter; A Guirao; H Hofer; I Cox
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Aberration generation by contact lenses with aspheric and asymmetric surfaces.

Authors:  Norberto López-Gil; José Francisco Castejón-Mochón; Antonio Benito; José María Marín; George Lo-a-Foe; Gildas Marin; Bruno Fermigier; Dominique Renard; Denis Joyeux; Nicolas Château; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Are all aberrations equal?

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Edwin J Sarver; Vic Khemsara
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  17 in total

1.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  [Keratoconus lenses: the small correction miracle].

Authors:  U Klühspies; A Grunder; S Goebels; F Schirra; B Seitz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Treatment strategies for corneal ectasia.

Authors:  Jennifer G Bromley; J Bradley Randleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Correlation between visual function and refractive, topographic, pachymetric and aberrometric data in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Neslihan Bayraktar Bilen; Ibrahim F Hepsen; Carlos G Arce
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  LogMAR and Stereoacuity in Keratoconus Corrected with Spectacles and Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Sangeetha Metlapally; Parthasarathi Kalaiselvan; Clifton M Schor; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Wavefront-guided scleral lens prosthetic device for keratoconus.

Authors:  Ramkumar Sabesan; Lynette Johns; Olga Tomashevskaya; Deborah S Jacobs; Perry Rosenthal; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Chi Nguyen; Anita Ticak; Darren E Koenig; James D Elswick; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.