Literature DB >> 16246774

Measurement of the spatial shift of the pupil center.

Massimo Camellin1, Federico Gambino, Stefano Casaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the pupil center as an anatomic landmark for excimer laser treatments.
SETTING: Sekal-Microchirurgia-Rovigo Centre, Rovigo, Italy.
METHODS: Pupillometry with the Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici S.R.L. (CSO) pupil-measuring module (incorporated in Eye Top videokeratoscope) was performed in 52 patients with a diagnosis of myopia and in 25 patients with a diagnosis of hyperopia. Measurements both in mesopic and photopic conditions consisted of pupil diameters, spatial shift of the pupil center, and the distance between the pupil center and keratoscopic axis.
RESULTS: The mean pupil diameter in photopic conditions of illumination in myopic eyes was 3.52 mm +/- 0.56 (SD), while in mesopic conditions it was 5.37 +/- 0.78 mm; in hyperopic eyes the mean photopic pupil diameter was 3.01 +/- 0.46 mm, while the mean mesopic diameter was 5.12 +/- 0.48 mm. The mean spatial shift of the pupil center in myopic eyes was 0.086 mm (maximum 0.269 mm), while in the hyperopic eyes it was 0.095 mm (maximum 0.283 mm). The mean distance between the pupil center and keratoscopic axis in myopic eyes was 0.226 +/- 0.13 mm (maximum 0.75 mm), while in hyperopic eyes it was 0.45 +/- 0.19 mm (maximum 0.8 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The mean of the measured pupil sizes was greater in myopic eyes than in hyperopic eyes. The spatial shift of the pupil center, as the pupil dilates, was relatively small in all groups; therefore, the pupil center is a good anatomic landmark for both traditional refractive surgery and wavefront-guided treatments. The mean distance between the keratoscopic axis and pupil center was greater in the hyperopic group than in the myopic group. Therefore, centration of any laser treatment on the basis of the keratoscopic analysis should be done carefully, especially in hyperopic eyes and in cases in which the pupil center is meaningfully shifted from keratoscopic axis, even in photopic conditions of illumination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16246774     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  [Pupil centroid shift: Marketing tool or essential clinical parameter?].

Authors:  I Fischinger; T G Seiler; G Schmidinger; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia.

Authors:  Xiaojian He; Lingling Niu; Huamao Miao; Feng Zhao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Limbus-centered marking technique-assisted continuous circular capsulorhexis.

Authors:  Xiaogang Wang; Jing Dong; Minghui Deng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects.

Authors:  Hidenaga Kobashi; Kazutaka Kamiya; Tomoya Handa; Wakako Ando; Takushi Kawamorita; Akihito Igarashi; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Assessment of tilt and decentration of crystalline lens and intraocular lens relative to the corneal topographic axis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shuhei Kimura; Yuki Morizane; Yusuke Shiode; Masayuki Hirano; Shinichiro Doi; Shinji Toshima; Atsushi Fujiwara; Fumio Shiraga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.