Literature DB >> 17442363

The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.

Susana T L Chung1, Samuel H Jarvis, Sing-Hang Cheung.   

Abstract

Little is known about the systematic impact of blur on reading performance. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of dioptric blur on reading performance in a group of normally sighted young adults. We measured monocular reading performance and visual acuity for 19 observers with normal vision, for five levels of optical blur (no-blur, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3D). Dioptric blur was induced using convex trial lenses placed in front of the testing eye, with the pupil dilated and in the presence of a 3mm artificial pupil. Reading performance was assessed using eight versions of the MNREAD Acuity Chart. For each level of dioptric blur, observers read aloud sentences on one of these charts, from large to small print. Reading time for each sentence and the number of errors made were recorded and converted to reading speed in words per minute. Visual acuity was measured using 4-orientation Landolt C stimuli. For all levels of dioptric blur, reading speed increased with print size up to a certain print size and then remained constant at the maximum reading speed. By fitting nonlinear mixed-effects models, we found that the maximum reading speed was minimally affected by blur up to 2D, but was approximately 23% slower for 3D of blur. When the amount of blur increased from 0 (no-blur) to 3D, the threshold print size (print size corresponded to 80% of the maximum reading speed) increased from 0.01 to 0.88 logMAR, reading acuity worsened from -0.16 to 0.58 logMAR, and visual acuity worsened from -0.19 to 0.64 logMAR. The similar rates of change with blur for threshold print size, reading acuity and visual acuity implicates that visual acuity is a good predictor of threshold print size and reading acuity. Like visual acuity, reading performance is susceptible to the degrading effect of optical blur. For increasing amount of blur, larger print sizes are required to attain the maximum reading speed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17442363      PMCID: PMC3572218          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  38 in total

1.  Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur.

Authors:  H Akutsu; H E Bedell; S S Patel
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Visual performance after correcting the monochromatic and chromatic aberrations of the eye.

Authors:  Geun-Young Yoon; David R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos; Xin Hong; Arthur Bradley; Xu Cheng
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Unequal reduction in visual acuity with positive and negative defocusing lenses in myopes.

Authors:  Hema Radhakrishnan; Shahina Pardhan; Richard I Calver; Daniel J O'Leary
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non-myopes.

Authors:  Hema Radhakrishnan; Shahina Pardhan; Richard I Calver; Daniel J O'Leary
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data.

Authors:  M L Lindstrom; D M Bates
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision.

Authors:  J S Mansfield; G E Legge; M C Bane
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; I L Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  15 in total

1.  Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Ethan A Lorsung; John Stephen Mansfield; Charles Bigelow; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Reading Fluency in School-Aged Children with Bilateral Astigmatism.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey; Joseph M Miller; J Daniel Twelker; Amy L Davis
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Uncorrected Hyperopia and Preschool Early Literacy: Results of the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Elise Ciner; Maureen Maguire; Bruce Moore; Jill Pentimonti; Maxwell Pistilli; Lynn Cyert; T Rowan Candy; Graham Quinn; Gui-Shuang Ying
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Lexical decisions in adults with low and high susceptibility to pattern-related visual stress: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  James M Gilchrist; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-14

6.  Visual acuity measured with luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise letter stimuli in young adults and adults above 50 years old.

Authors:  Pui Juan Woi; Sharanjeet Kaur; Sarah J Waugh; Mohd Izzuddin Hairol
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-08-12

7.  Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance.

Authors:  Julia S Benoit; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Impact of corneal cross-linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on blurring strength.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Haris Sideroudi; Dimitris Angelonias; Kimonas Georgantzoglou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-01

9.  Effect of defocus on response time in different age groups: A pilot study.

Authors:  Balamurali Vasudevan; Kaiser Sultani; Christopher Cossette; Brandon Burr
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Blur Unblurred-A Mini Tutorial.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.