Literature DB >> 9114506

Optical density of the human lens.

J Xu1, J Pokorny, V C Smith.   

Abstract

Optic disk reflectance was measured from 27 normal observers with their physiological lenses (aged 21-74 yr) and from two pseudophakic observers (aged 69 and 70 yr) with use of a Utrecht fundus reflection densitometer. Psychophysical heterochromatic flicker photometric luminance matches (10 degrees field) were obtained on the same group of the observers. A four-parameter model incorporating lens density, hemoglobin absorption, optic disk reflectance, and superficial stray light was used to fit the reflectometric data. A model incorporating lens density and the Judd revised spectral luminous-efficiency function was used to fit the psychophysical data. The lens-density spectrum used the two-factor aging model of Pokorny, et al. [Appl. Opt. 26, 1437 (1987)]. The lens density for each normal observer was estimated through a least-squares fitting procedure yielding an estimated lens age. For the reflectometric data the observer's chronological age agreed with estimated lens age with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. The reflectometric regression line underestimated chronological age by approximately 5 yr. The mean reflectance of the optic disk was 0.047 with standard error of the mean of 0.0044. Data from the pseudophakic observers were well described when corneal density was used to replace lens density. The lens density was also estimated from the psychophysical data. The observer's chronological age agreed with psychophysically estimated lens age with a correlation coefficient of 0.92. It was concluded that the in vivo lens density can be estimated from the reflectance spectrum measured off the optic disk. The reflectance spectrum of the optic disk was inferred to be close to spectrally neutral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9114506     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.14.000953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  22 in total

Review 1.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Quantitative measurements of autofluorescence with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  François Delori; Jonathan P Greenberg; Russell L Woods; Jörg Fischer; Tobias Duncker; Janet Sparrow; R Theodore Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  In vivo macular pigment measurements: a comparison of resonance Raman spectroscopy and heterochromatic flicker photometry.

Authors:  R E Hogg; R S Anderson; M R Stevenson; M B Zlatkova; U Chakravarthy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Phase-shifting response to light in older adults.

Authors:  Seong Jae Kim; Susan Benloucif; Kathryn Jean Reid; Sandra Weintraub; Nancy Kennedy; Lisa F Wolfe; Phyllis C Zee
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Visual adaptations in a diurnal rodent, Octodon degus.

Authors:  G H Jacobs; J B Calderone; J A Fenwick; K Krogh; G A Williams
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-04-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Method for Adapting the Grayscale Standard Display Function to the Aging Eye.

Authors:  Giovanni Ramponi; Aldo Badano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Temporal characteristics of melanopsin inputs to the human pupil light reflex.

Authors:  Daniel S Joyce; Beatrix Feigl; Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Macular pigment in ophthalmic practice; a survey.

Authors:  Ian J Murray; Batul Hassanali; David Carden
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.