Literature DB >> 29726489

Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Gareth D Hastings, Jason D Marsack, Larry N Thibos, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

The visual image quality metric the visual Strehl ratio (VSX) combines a comprehensive description of the optics of an eye (wavefront error) with an estimate of the photopic neural processing of the visual system, and has been shown to be predictive of subjective best focus and well correlated with change in visual performance. Best-corrected visual image quality was determined for 146 eyes, and the quantitative relation of VSX, age, and pupil size is presented, including 95% confidence interval norms for age groups between 20 and 80 years and pupil diameters from 3 to 7 mm. These norms were validated using an independently collected population of wavefront error measurements. The best visual image quality was found in young eyes at smaller pupil sizes. Increasing pupil size caused a more rapid decrease in VSX than increasing age. These objectively determined benchmarks represent the best theoretical levels of visual image quality achievable with a sphere, cylinder, and axis correction in normal eyes and can be used to evaluate both traditional and wavefront-guided optical corrections provided by refractive surgery, contact lenses, and spectacles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29726489      PMCID: PMC6815346          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.35.000732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  64 in total

1.  Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye.

Authors:  R I Calver; M J Cox; D B Elliott
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Retinal image quality for virtual eyes generated by a statistical model of ocular wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Power profiles of multifocal contact lenses and their interpretation.

Authors:  Sotiris Plainis; David A Atchison; W Neil Charman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Estimating the eye aberration coefficients in resized pupils: is it better to refit or to rescale?

Authors:  Salvador Bará; Eliseo Pailos; Justo Arines; Norberto López-Gil; Larry Thibos
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Determination of the point-spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical-digital method.

Authors:  J Santamaría; P Artal; J Bescós
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Effects of aging in retinal image quality.

Authors:  P Artal; M Ferro; I Miranda; R Navarro
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  A demonstration of the visual importance and flexibility of spatial-frequency amplitude and phase.

Authors:  L N Piotrowski; F W Campbell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Change in visual acuity is highly correlated with change in six image quality metrics independent of wavefront error and/or pupil diameter.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Calculation of retinal image quality for polychromatic light.

Authors:  Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Roxana T Hemmati; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Clinical applications of personalising the neural components of visual image quality metrics for individual eyes.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Alexander W Schill; Chuan Hu; Daniel R Coates; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Authors' Response.

Authors:  Hannah R Gregory; Augustine N Nti; James S Wolffsohn; David A Berntsen; Eric R Ritchey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.106

4.  Influence of rigid lens decentration and rotation on visual image quality in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Jos J Rozema; Gareth D Hastings; Marta Jiménez-García; Carina Koppen; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  Orientation-specific long-term neural adaptation of the visual system in keratoconus.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Alexander W Schill; Chuan Hu; Daniel R Coates; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 1.984

6.  Case Report: What Are We Doing for Our "20/20 Unhappy" Scleral Lens Patients?

Authors:  Lan Chi Nguyen; Matthew J Kauffman; Gareth D Hastings; Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Impact of Pupil Diameter on Objective Refraction Determination and Predicted Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ayeswary Ravikumar; Julia S Benoit; Jason D Marsack
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.