Literature DB >> 17128604

Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Axel Buchner1, Bettina Mehl, Klaus Rothermund, Dirk Wentura.   

Abstract

In a game context, nonwords either were artificially associated with negative valence or were in some sense neutral or irrelevant. Subsequently, participants memorized target words in silence or while attempting to ignore the negatively valent, irrelevant, or neutral auditory distractor nonwords. The presence of distractor nonwords impaired recall performance, but negative distractor nonwords caused more disruption than neutral and irrelevant distractors, which did not differ in how much disruption they caused. These findings conceptually replicate earlier results showing disruption due to valence with natural language words and extend them by demonstrating that auditory features that may possibly be confounded with valence in natural language words cannot be the cause of the observed disruption. Explanations of the irrelevant speech effect within working memory models that specify an explicit role of attention in the maintenance of information for immediate serial recall can explain this pattern of results, whereas structural models of working memory cannot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17128604     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

3.  A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.

Authors:  Daniel Algom; Eran Chajut; Shlomo Lev
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

4.  Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.

Authors:  Frank P McKenna; Dinkar Sharma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Bettina Mehl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

6.  Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

Authors:  D Jones; C Madden; C Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

7.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information.

Authors:  F Pratto; O P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-09

Review 8.  A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors:  J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-05

9.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-03

10.  Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

2.  Valence modulates source memory for faces.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

3.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

4.  Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

5.  Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Nick Perham; Patrik Sörqvist; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

6.  Positive and negative mood states do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction in the serial-recall paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prior information can alter how sounds are perceived and emotionally regulated.

Authors:  Örn Kolbeinsson; Erkin Asutay; Johan Wallqvist; Hugo Hesser
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-24

8.  Negative target stimuli do not influence cross-modal auditory distraction.

Authors:  Saskia Kaiser; Axel Buchner; Laura Mieth; Raoul Bell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.