Literature DB >> 14979812

Reversing the emotional Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast and slow components.

Frank P McKenna1, Dinkar Sharma.   

Abstract

The relative contributions of slow and fast (online) components in a modified emotional Stroop task were evaluated. The slow component, neglected in previous research, was shown to lead to the prediction of a reversed emotional intrusion effect using pseudorandomly mixed negative and neutral stimuli. This prediction was supported in Experiments 1 and 2. In Experiments 3 and 4, a new paradigm was developed that allowed a more direct observation of the nature of disruptive effects from negative stimuli. The results provided a clear demonstration of the presence of the slow component. The fast component, which has generally been assumed to be the source of the interference, was shown, in fact, to have little or no role in the disruption.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14979812     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  56 in total

1.  Stop what you are not doing! Emotional pictures interfere with the task not to respond.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Helen Tibboel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Counterbalancing in smoking cue research: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Sayette; Kasey M Griffin; W Michael Sayers
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.

Authors:  Anna-Malika Camblats; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-11-09

4.  Anger in brain and body: the neural and physiological perturbation of decision-making by emotion.

Authors:  Sarah N Garfinkel; Emma Zorab; Nakulan Navaratnam; Miriam Engels; Núria Mallorquí-Bagué; Ludovico Minati; Nicholas G Dowell; Jos F Brosschot; Julian F Thayer; Hugo D Critchley
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Relevant distractors do not cause negative priming.

Authors:  Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

6.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Bettina Mehl; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

7.  Sequence effects in a spatial cueing task: endogenous orienting is sensitive to orienting in the preceding trial.

Authors:  Ellen M M Jongen; Fren T Y Smulders
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-19

8.  Mental rubbernecking to negative information depends on task context.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Karen J Mitchell; Carol L Raye; Joseph T McGuire; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

9.  Associations between mindfulness and implicit cognition and self-reported affect.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Lorraine R Reitzel; Paul Cinciripini; Yisheng Li; Marianne T Marcus; Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; David W Wetter
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.716

10.  Conditioned task-set competition: Neural mechanisms of emotional interference in depression.

Authors:  Aleks Stolicyn; J Douglas Steele; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.