Literature DB >> 18491501

Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.

Axel Buchner1, Raoul Bell, Klaus Rothermund, Dirk Wentura.   

Abstract

Participants memorized lists of visually presented digits in silence or while ignoring distractor sounds that either came from the front and thus from the direction in which participants' attention was oriented, or from behind. Distractor sounds impaired recall performance, but the largest impairment was observed when the sound source was directionally close to the frontal visual target display. The results are consistent with the assumption of cross-modal attentional links in models of attention, and they are problematic for explanations of the irrelevant-sound effect within working memory models that do not specify an explicit role of attention in the maintenance of information for immediate serial recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18491501     DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.3.617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence.

Authors:  D M Jones; D Alford; W J Macken; S P Banbury; S Tremblay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting.

Authors:  L M Ward; J J McDonald; D Lin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-08

3.  Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by cross-modal spatial attention.

Authors:  John J McDonald; Wolfgang A Teder-Sälejärvi; Francesco Di Russo; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

5.  Contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization.

Authors:  Erno H A Langendijk; Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The cognitive neuroscience of auditory distraction.

Authors:  Tom Campbell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking.

Authors:  W Ellermeier; J Hellbruck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Spatial effects in speech perception in the absence of spatial competition.

Authors:  C Hublet; J Morais; P Bertelson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.

Authors:  C Spence; J Ranson; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

10.  Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

2.  Evidence for habituation of the irrelevant-sound effect on serial recall.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

3.  Irrelevant music: How suprasegmental changes of a melody's tempo and mode affect the disruptive potential of music on serial recall.

Authors:  Judith Schweppe; Jens Knigge
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08

4.  Effects of Auditory Distraction on Face Memory.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Laura Mieth; Jan Philipp Röer; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.