Literature DB >> 15915795

Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.

Axel Buchner1, Edgar Erdfelder.   

Abstract

In this study, participants memorized frequent or rare target words in silence or while ignoring frequent or rare distractor words. Distractor words impaired recall performance, but low-frequency distractor words caused more impairment than did high-frequency distractor words. We demonstrate how to solve the identifiability problem for Schweickert's (1993) multinomial processing tree model of immediate recall, and then use this model to show that irrelevant speech affected both the probability with which intact target word representations were available for serial recall and the probability of successful reconstruction of item identities based on degraded short-term memory traces. However, the type of irrelevant speech--low-versus high-frequency words--selectively affected the probability of intact target word representations. These results are consistent with an explanation of the irrelevant speech effect within the framework proposed by Cowan (1995), and they pose problems for other explanations of the irrelevant speech effect. The analyses also confirm the validity of Schweickert's process model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915795     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  How to Assess a Model's Testability and Identifiability.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  AppleTree: a multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers.

Authors:  R Rothkegel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-11

3.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

4.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

5.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

6.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

7.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Bettina Mehl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

8.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information.

Authors:  F Pratto; O P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-09

9.  On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  D C LeCompte; D M Shaibe
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1997-02

Review 10.  A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall.

Authors:  R Schweickert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-03
View more
  10 in total

1.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Bettina Mehl; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

2.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Authors:  Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

3.  A constrained rasch model of trace redintegration in serial recall.

Authors:  Steven Roodenrys; Leonie M Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

4.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  The relative merit of empirical priors in non-identifiable and sloppy models: Applications to models of learning and decision-making : Empirical priors.

Authors:  Mikhail S Spektor; David Kellen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

6.  Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

7.  The interaction of word frequency and concreteness in immediate serial recall.

Authors:  Leonie M Miller; Steven Roodenrys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

8.  Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.

Authors:  C Philip Beaman; Maciej Hanczakowski; Helen M Hodgetts; John E Marsh; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

9.  When It's Harder to Ignorar than to Ignore: Evidence of Greater Attentional Capture from a Non-Dominant Language.

Authors:  Sayuri Hayakawa; Anthony Shook; Viorica Marian
Journal:  Int J Billing       Date:  2020-04-27

10.  Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Nick Perham; Patrik Sörqvist; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.