Literature DB >> 15355142

A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.

Daniel Algom1, Eran Chajut, Shlomo Lev.   

Abstract

The role of Stroop processes in the emotional Stroop effect was subjected to a conceptual scrutiny augmented by a series of experiments entailing reading or lexical decision as well as color naming. The analysis showed that the Stroop effect is not defined in the emotional Stroop task. The experiments showed that reading, lexical decision, and color naming all are slower with emotional words and that this delay is immune to task-irrelevant variation and to changes in the relative salience of the words and the colors. The delay was absent when emotional and neutral words appeared in a single block. A threat-driven generic slowdown is implicated, not a selective attention mechanism associated with the classic Stroop effect. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15355142     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  115 in total

1.  Emotion triggers executive attention: anterior cingulate cortex and amygdala responses to emotional words in a conflict task.

Authors:  Philipp Kanske; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The modification of attentional bias to emotional information: A review of the techniques, mechanisms, and relevance to emotional disorders.

Authors:  Michael Browning; Emily A Holmes; Catherine J Harmer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Stop what you are not doing! Emotional pictures interfere with the task not to respond.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Helen Tibboel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Bettina Mehl; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

5.  Common regions of dorsal anterior cingulate and prefrontal-parietal cortices provide attentional control of distracters varying in emotionality and visibility.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Derek Mitchell; Matthew Jones; Krystal Mondillo; Meena Vythilingam; R James R Blair
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Adam K Anderson; Lily Riggs; Jeremy B Caplan; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Early adolescents show sustained susceptibility to cognitive interference by emotional distractors.

Authors:  Sabine Heim; Niklas Ihssen; Marcus Hasselhorn; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2012-10-25

Review 8.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

9.  Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist.

Authors:  Ruthger Righart; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Conditioned task-set competition: Neural mechanisms of emotional interference in depression.

Authors:  Aleks Stolicyn; J Douglas Steele; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.