Literature DB >> 1615168

Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

D Jones1, C Madden, C Miles.   

Abstract

Memory for visually presented items is impaired by speech that is played as an irrelevant background. The paper presents the view that changing state of the auditory material is an important prerequisite for this disruption. Four experiments studied the effects of sounds varying in complexity in an attempt to establish which features of changing state in the auditory signal lead to diminished recall. Simple unvarying or repetitive speech sounds were not sufficient to induce the irrelevant speech effect (Experiment 1): in addition, simple analogues of speech, possessing regular or irregular envelopes and using a range of carriers, failed to imitate the action of speech (Experiment 2). Variability of between-utterance phonology in the irrelevant stream (Experiment 3) emerged as a crucial factor. Moreover, predictability of the syllable sequence did not reduce the degree of disruption (Experiment 4) suggesting that supra-syllabic characteristics of the speech are of little importance. The results broadly support the idea that disruption of short-term memory only occurs when the speech stream changes in state. It is argued that disruption occurs in memory when cues to serial order based on phonological representations of heard material interfere with the phonological codes of visual origin. It is suggested that cues to changing state of the speech input contaminate those associated with items of visual origin, which are already in a phonological store.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1615168     DOI: 10.1080/14640749208401304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  39 in total

1.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Authors:  D M Jones; S Tremblay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  The sandwich effect reassessed: effects of streaming, distraction, and modality.

Authors:  Alastair P Nicholls; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

5.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

6.  Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model.

Authors:  J Richard Hanley; Eirini Bakopoulou
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

7.  Do irrelevant sounds impair the maintenance of all characteristics of speech in memory?

Authors:  D Gabriel; E Gaudrain; G Lebrun-Guillaud; F Sheppard; I M Tomescu; A Schnider
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-12

8.  Articulatory suppression and the irrelevant-speech effect in short-term memory: does the locus of suppression matter?

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Anthony Pisegna
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

9.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Bettina Mehl; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

10.  Irrelevant speech effects and sequence learning.

Authors:  Lisa A Farley; Ian Neath; David W Allbritton; Aimée M Surprenant
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.