Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Literature DB >> 15552349

Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Axel Buchner¹, Klaus Rothermund, Dirk Wentura, Bettina Mehl.

Abstract

Participants memorized target words in silence or while ignoring neutral or valent (positive or negative) distractor words that could be either possessor-relevant or other-relevant. Distractor words impaired recall performance, but valent distractor words caused more disruption than neutral distractors, and negative distractors caused more disruption than positive distractors. The results are problematic for explanations of the irrelevant speech effect within working memory models that do not specify an explicit role of attention in the maintenance of information for immediate serial recall.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15552349 DOI： 10.3758/bf03195862

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Cognit ISSN： 0090-502X

14 in total

1. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors: C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1999-01

Review 2. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors: I Neath
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2000-09

Review 3. Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications.

Authors: S P Banbury; W J Macken; S Tremblay; D M Jones
Journal: Hum Factors Date: 2001 Impact factor: 2.888

4. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors: Emily M Elliott
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 2002-04

Review 5. SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN MAN.

Authors: A M TREISMAN
Journal: Br Med Bull Date: 1964-01 Impact factor: 4.291

6. Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information.

Authors: F Pratto; O P John
Journal: J Pers Soc Psychol Date: 1991-09

Review 7. A feature model of immediate memory.

Authors: J S Nairne
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1990-05

8. The unattended speech effect: perception or memory?

Authors: A Baddeley; P Salamé
Journal: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn Date: 1986-10 Impact factor: 3.051

9. Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: the role of segmentation.

Authors: D M Jones; W J Macken; A C Murray
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1993-05

10. [Emotional content, imagery, concreteness and meaningfulness of 580 adjectives: contribution to the standardization and evaluation of relation hypotheses].

Authors: W Hager; S Mecklenbräuker; H Möller; R Westermann
Journal: Arch Psychol (Frankf) Date: 1985

22 in total

1. Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials.

Authors: Emily M Elliott; Nelson Cowan
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 2005-06

Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

1. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Review 2. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Review 3. Auditory distraction and short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications.

4. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Review 5. SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN MAN.

6. Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information.

Review 7. A feature model of immediate memory.

8. The unattended speech effect: perception or memory?

9. Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: the role of segmentation.

10. [Emotional content, imagery, concreteness and meaningfulness of 580 adjectives: contribution to the standardization and evaluation of relation hypotheses].

1. Coherence of the irrelevant-sound effect: individual profiles of short-term memory and susceptibility to task-irrelevant materials.

2. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

3. Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception.

4. Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

5. Valence modulates source memory for faces.

6. The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

7. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.

8. Word frequency of irrelevant speech distractors affects serial recall.

9. Sound source location modulates the irrelevant-sound effect.

10. Memory as discrimination: what distraction reveals.