Literature DB >> 7731364

Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: the role of spatial location and timing.

D M Jones1, W J Macken.   

Abstract

Typically, hearing a repeated syllable produces minimal disruption of serial recall of visual lists, but a sequence of different syllables impairs performance markedly. Two conditions for presenting an identical sequence of three syllables are compared: one, in which, by means of stereophony, each syllable is assigned to the left, center, or right auditory locus (three streams not changing in state), and another, in which the same syllable sequence occurs in one location only (one stream with changing state). Disruption was significantly less in the stereophonic than in the monophonic condition. There was a joint effect of changing state and location, not an effect of the number of locations alone. In Experiment 2, temporal predictability was used to manipulate changing state. The disruptive effect of regular presentation of a repeated syllable was markedly increased when it was presented irregularly. The results are discussed in the context of organizational factors in short-term memory.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7731364     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  11 in total

1.  Auditory segregation: stream or streams?

Authors:  A S Bregman; A I Rudnicky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Irrelevant speech and serial recall: implications for theories of attention and working memory.

Authors:  D Jones; N Morris
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1992-09

Review 3.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.

Authors:  C G Penney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

4.  Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.

Authors:  D Jones; C Madden; C Miles
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1992-05

5.  Habituation to irrelevant speech: effects on a visual short-term memory task.

Authors:  N Morris; D M Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-03

6.  The unattended speech effect: perception or memory?

Authors:  A Baddeley; P Salamé
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  On the perceived unitization of repetitive auditory patterns.

Authors:  F L Royer; D A Robin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

8.  Noise, unattended speech and short-term memory.

Authors:  P Salamé; A Baddeley
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: further support for the changing state hypothesis.

Authors:  D M Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1994-02

10.  Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: the role of segmentation.

Authors:  D M Jones; W J Macken; A C Murray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05
View more
  16 in total

1.  The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.

Authors:  C B Neely; D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

Review 2.  Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Authors:  D M Jones; S Tremblay
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.

Authors:  I Neath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

4.  The sandwich effect reassessed: effects of streaming, distraction, and modality.

Authors:  Alastair P Nicholls; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

5.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.

Authors:  Axel Buchner; Bettina Mehl; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

7.  Disruption by speech of serial short-term memory: the role of changing-state vowels.

Authors:  Robert W Hughes; Sébastien Tremblay; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

8.  What causes auditory distraction?

Authors:  William J Macken; Fiona G Phelps; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

10.  Slave systems in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  David Caplan; Gloria Waters; David Howard
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.