Literature DB >> 17645176

Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults.

Raoul Bell1, Axel Buchner.   

Abstract

Three experiments are reported in which a total of 182 old and 193 young adults recalled sequences of digits presented visually in silence or accompanied by office noise. In each experiment, an effect of irrelevant sound was found-that is, a reduction of serial recall due to auditory distraction. Old adults exhibited poorer serial recall than did young adults, but the irrelevant-sound effect was equivalent in both age groups. This was true even though the sound level of the irrelevant sound was adjusted to each individual's hearing capability, and the effect remained whether or not the difficulty of the serial recall task was equated across age groups. These results are problematic for the inhibitory deficit theory of cognitive aging, which predicts that old adults should be more susceptible to auditory distraction than are young adults.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645176     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  47 in total

1.  The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

2.  The irrelevant speech effect: a PET study.

Authors:  Jens Gisselgård; Karl Magnus Petersson; Alan Baddeley; Martin Ingvar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.

Authors:  Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

4.  Aging and inhibitory control in text comprehension.

Authors:  J Dywan; W E Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-06

5.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.

Authors:  C P Beaman; D M Jones
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-08

6.  Is level irrelevant in "irrelevant speech"? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking.

Authors:  W Ellermeier; J Hellbruck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Inhibition in attention and aging.

Authors:  J M McDowd
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Language, aging, and inhibitory deficits: evaluation of a theory.

Authors:  D M Burke
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 9.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Inhibition of visual and conceptual information during reading in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J M Duchek; D A Balota; V C Thessing
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  1998-09
View more
  11 in total

1.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Röer; Raoul Bell; Sandra Dentale; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

2.  Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.

Authors:  Alicia Leiva; Fabrice B R Parmentier; Pilar Andrés
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-05-23

3.  Comparable mechanisms of working memory interference by auditory and visual motion in youth and aging.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Theodore Zanto; Aneesha Nilakantan; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  [Audiometric test battery for presbycusis].

Authors:  T Steffens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  What determines auditory distraction? On the roles of local auditory changes and expectation violations.

Authors:  Jan P Röer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Acoustic Detail But Not Predictability of Task-Irrelevant Speech Disrupts Working Memory.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Cognition in Context: Understanding the Everyday Predictors of Cognitive Performance in a New Era of Measurement.

Authors:  Emma Weizenbaum; John Torous; Daniel Fulford
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?

Authors:  Yatin Mahajan; Jeesun Kim; Chris Davis
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Selective Attention and Sensory Modality in Aging: Curses and Blessings.

Authors:  Pascal W M Van Gerven; Maria J S Guerreiro
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Preserved memory-based orienting of attention with impaired explicit memory in healthy ageing.

Authors:  Gerardo Salvato; Eva Z Patai; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.