Literature DB >> 16812067

Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

S S Pliskoff, R Cicerone, T D Nelson.   

Abstract

Concurrent variable-interval schedules were arranged with a main key that alternated in color and schedule assignment, along with a changeover key on which a small fixed ratio was required to changeover. Acceptable matching was observed with pigeons in two replications, but there was a tendency toward overmatching. Local response rates were found to differ for unequal schedules of a concurrent pair: local response rate was greater for the variable-interval schedule with the smaller average interreinforcement interval, but qualifications based on an interresponse-time analysis were discussed. In a second experiment, two 3-minute variable-interval schedules were arranged concurrently, and the experimental variable was the changeover procedure: either a changeover delay was incurred by each changeover or a small fixed ratio on a changeover key was required to complete a changeover. Changeover delays of 2 and 5 seconds were compared with a fixed-ratio changeover of five responses. The response output on the main key (associated with the variable-interval schedules) was greater when a changeover delay was arranged than when a fixed ratio was required to changeover. A detailed analysis of stripchart records showed that a 2-second delay generated an increased response rate for 3 seconds after a changeover, while the fixed-ratio requirement generated an increased rate during the first second only, followed by a depressed response rate for 2 seconds.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812067      PMCID: PMC1332841          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.

Authors:  R M Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An invariant relation between changing over and reinforcement.

Authors:  L R Dreyfus; L G Dorman; J G Fetterman; D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Testing a stochastic foraging model in an operant simulation: Agreement with qualitative but not quantitative predictions.

Authors:  W A Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, changeover, and travel.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Changeover delay and concurrent-schedule performance in domestic hens.

Authors:  W Temple; J M Scown; T M Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice, changeover, and travel: A quantitative model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the measurement of time allocation on multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; L Charman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; J G Fetterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.