Literature DB >> 16811546

Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances.

S S Pliskoff.   

Abstract

Two variable-interval 3-min schedules functioned concurrently to arrange reinforcement of a pigeon's pecks on a single key, the main key. Each schedule was associated with a distinct color of the main key; a response on a second key alternated the color and schedule assignment of the main key. A changeover delay, a period of time following schedule and key-color alternation during which reinforcement of responding on the main key could not occur, was arranged with equal or with unequal durations for the two directions of alternation. Durations were varied from 0.33 sec to 27 sec, in addition to no delay. With equal delays for the two directions of alternation, the pigeon alternated the schedules less often the larger the delay duration. When the delays in the two directions of alternation were unequal, it could be shown that alternation of the schedules was reduced both by a delay just incurred by the last alternation and by a. delay to be incurred by the next. The latter delay was more potent in reducing the frequency of alternations.

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811546      PMCID: PMC1333875          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance.

Authors:  R L Ten Eyck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent performances: effect of punishment contingent on the switching response.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent performances: rate constancies without changeover delays.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Changeover ratio effects on concurrent variable-interval performance.

Authors:  J M White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  How to maximize reward rate on two variable-interval paradigms.

Authors:  A I Houston; J McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  An invariant relation between changing over and reinforcement.

Authors:  L R Dreyfus; L G Dorman; J G Fetterman; D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  I W Hunter; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams; M C Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.