Literature DB >> 11218228

Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

T A Shahan1, K A Lattal.   

Abstract

In three experiments, pigeons were used to examine the independent effects of two normally confounded delays to reinforcement associated with changing between concurrently available variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. In Experiments 1 and 2, combinations of changeover-delay durations and fixed-interval travel requirements were arranged in a changeover-key procedure. The delay from a changeover-produced stimulus change to a reinforcer was varied while the delay between the last response on one alternative and a reinforcer on the other (the total obtained delay) was held constant. Changeover rates decreased as a negative power function of the total obtained delay. The delay between a changeover-produced stimulus change had a small and inconsistent effect on changeover rates. In Experiment 3, changeover delays and fixed-interval travel requirements were arranged independently. Changeover rates decreased as a negative power function of the total obtained delay despite variations in the delay from a change in stimulus conditions to a reinforcer. Periods of high-rate responding following a changeover, however, were higher near the end of the delay from a change in stimulus conditions to a reinforcer. The results of these experiments suggest that the effects of changeover delays and travel requirements primarily result from changes in the delay between a response at one alternative and a reinforcer at the other, but the pattern of responding immediately after a changeover depends on the delay from a changeover-produced change in stimulus conditions to a reinforcer.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11218228      PMCID: PMC1284799          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  36 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference after training with differential changeover delays.

Authors:  B Williams; M Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.

Authors:  B M Jones; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A local model of concurrent performance.

Authors:  J Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Melioration, matching, and maximization.

Authors:  W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, changeover, and travel: A quantitative model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  R L Menlove
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Optimality And Concurrent Variable-interval Variable-ratio Schedules.

Authors:  W Baum; C Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  An alternative to the stay/switch equation assessed when using a changeover-delay.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.