Literature DB >> 16812283

Choice, changeover, and travel.

W M Baum.   

Abstract

Since foraging in nature can be viewed as instrumental behavior, choice between sources of food, known as "patches," can be viewed as choice between instrumental response alternatives. Whereas the travel required to change alternatives deters changeover in nature, the changeover delay (COD) usually deters changeover in the laboratory. In this experiment, pigeons were exposed to laboratory choice situations, concurrent variable-interval schedules, that were standard except for the introduction of a travel requirement for changeover. As the travel requirement increased, rate of changeover decreased and preference for a favored alternative strengthened. When the travel requirement was small, the relations between choice and relative reinforcement revealed the usual tendencies toward matching and undermatching. When the travel requirement was large, strong overmatching occurred. These results, together with those from experiments in which changeover was deterred by punishment or a fixed-ratio requirement, deviate from the matching law, even when a correction is made for cost of changeover. If one accepted an argument that the COD is analogous to travel, the results suggest that the norm in choice relations would be overmatching. This overmatching, however, might only be the sign of an underlying strategy approximating optimization.

Year:  1982        PMID: 16812283      PMCID: PMC1347826          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  22 in total

1.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  R L Menlove
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Chained concurrent schedules: reinforcement as situation transition.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Formal properties of the matching law.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Time allocation and negative reinforcement.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Quasi-reinforcement: control of responding by a percentage-reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A J Neuringer; S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  28 in total

1.  Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Travel time and concurrent-schedule choice: retrospective versus prospective control.

Authors:  M Davison; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Determinants of reinforcer accumulation during an operant task.

Authors:  J M McFarland; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Selected publication trends in JEAB: Implications for the vitality of the experimental analysis of behavior.

Authors:  Bryan K Saville; L Kimberly Epting; William Buskist
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

8.  Leaving patches: Effects of travel requirements.

Authors:  D McCarthy; P Voss; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects on preference of reinforcement delay, number of reinforcers, and terminal-link duration.

Authors:  W R Poniewaz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Testing a stochastic foraging model in an operant simulation: Agreement with qualitative but not quantitative predictions.

Authors:  W A Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.