Literature DB >> 16812229

Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement.

S S Pliskoff, J G Fetterman.   

Abstract

Concurrent variable-interval two-minute and six-minute schedules were arranged while the fixed-ratio changeover requirement was varied among one, two, and four responses. A four-response requirement produced overmatching in the response and time data. A one-response requirement produced consistent undermatching in the time data but mixed results in the response data. The two-response requirement showed undermatching in the time data and overmatching in the response data. The results are discussed in relation to previous research using changeover requirements of five and ten responses, which produced clear tendencies toward overmatching, especially with response data. Taken together, these findings suggest that matching is not a unique result, and that undermatching or overmatching can be produced by continuous variation of the changeover requirements.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812229      PMCID: PMC1333049          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Free-operant choice behavior: A molecular analysis.

Authors:  D J Navarick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; R Cicerone; T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  16 in total

1.  Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.

Authors:  R M Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An invariant relation between changing over and reinforcement.

Authors:  L R Dreyfus; L G Dorman; J G Fetterman; D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Testing a stochastic foraging model in an operant simulation: Agreement with qualitative but not quantitative predictions.

Authors:  W A Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, changeover, and travel.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Undermatching and overmatching as deviations from the matching law.

Authors:  J H Wearden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Local rates of responding and reinforcement during concurrent schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; C L Melville; M A Buck; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent schedules: Spatial separation of response alternatives.

Authors:  H Boelens; P F Kop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.

Authors:  J C Todorov; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt De Sá
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.