Literature DB >> 16812304

An invariant relation between changing over and reinforcement.

L R Dreyfus, L G Dorman, J G Fetterman, D A Stubbs.   

Abstract

Although concurrent schedules may arrange reinforcers irregularly, relatively large numbers of reinforcers are obtained when an animal changes from one schedule to the other. This paper proposes a quantitative relation that predicts the proportion of reinforcers obtained when an animal is working on a schedule and the proportion when the animal changes over to a schedule. Basically the relation states that the number of reinforcers obtained while an animal works on a schedule varies directly with the relative amount of time spent working on that schedule; and the number of reinforcers obtained when an animal changes to a schedule varies directly with the relative amount of time spent on the alternate schedule. An important aspect of this relation is that when relative reinforcement rates are less than .50, more reinforcers are obtained just after an animal changes to a schedule than at all other times when this schedule is engaged. Data obtained both from a stat-bird and a live pigeon were in close agreement with the quantitative predictions. The relation between changing over and reinforcement held across several procedural changes that included changes in relative reinforcement rate, changes from independent to interdependent scheduling procedures, and changes in the variable-interval reinforcement distributions. The results are discussed in terms of the effects of the local distribution of reinforcement on responding. The local reinforcement distribution can affect local response rates and affects the resulting matching relation. This arrangement has implications for explanations of choice.

Year:  1982        PMID: 16812304      PMCID: PMC1347872          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Undermatching: a reappraisal of performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D L Myers; L E Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent performances: effect of punishment contingent on the switching response.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  R L Menlove
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Strict and random alternation in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.

Authors:  B M Jones; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice with a fixed requirement for food, and the generality of the matching relation.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; L R Dreyfus; J G Fetterman; L G Dorman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice between repleting/depleting patches: A concurrent-schedule procedure.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice and transformed interreinforcement intervals.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.