Literature DB >> 16812753

Changeover delay and concurrent-schedule performance in domestic hens.

W Temple, J M Scown, T M Foster.   

Abstract

Six domestic hens were exposed to a series of five pairs of two-key concurrent variable-interval schedules with a range of changeover delays from no delay to 15 s. Times spent responding on each alternative and total, within_, and post-changeover-delay response ratios were analyzed in terms of the generalized matching law. The sensitivity parameters, a, for response and time data were generally low when no changeover delay was programmed but were not 0.0. They were higher for all other changeover-delay values, with some tendency to increase as the changeover delay lengthened at very short delays. Within-delay responding was insensitive to reinforcement-rate differences at all changeover delays (a values close to 0.0). As a result of this insensitivity, post-changeover-delay responding was more sensitive to reinforcement-rate changes than was total responding. Interchangeover intervals increased systematically with changeover-delay duration. Responding, particularly after the changeover delay, was well predicted by an equation based on a reinforcer-loss model.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 16812753      PMCID: PMC1334381          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  I W Hunter; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A Markov model description of changeover probabilities on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, changeover, and travel: A quantitative model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent schedules of reinforcement: effects of gradual and abrupt increases in changeover delay.

Authors:  T S Allison; K E Lloyd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; R Cicerone; T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Travel time and concurrent-schedule choice: retrospective versus prospective control.

Authors:  M Davison; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contingency discriminability, matching, and bias in the concurrent-schedule responding of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  Angela Bron; Catherine E Sumpter; T Mary Foster; William Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent second-order schedules: some effects of variations in response number and duration.

Authors:  Diane M Sealey; Catherine E Sumpter; W Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Predicting and scaling hens' preferences for topographically different responses.

Authors:  C E Sumpter; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Divided attention performance and the matching law.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.