Literature DB >> 16812688

Testing a stochastic foraging model in an operant simulation: Agreement with qualitative but not quantitative predictions.

W A Roberts.   

Abstract

An operant simulation of foraging through baited and empty patches was studied with 4 pigeons. On a three-key panel, side keys were designated as patches, and successive opportunities to complete 16 fixed-ratio 10 schedules on side keys were defined as encounters with feeders. In a random half of the patches in any session, some of the fixed-ratio 10 schedules yielded reinforcement (baited feeders) and the other schedules yielded nonreinforcement (empty feeders). In the other half of the patches, all feeders were empty. Pigeons could travel between patches at any time by completing a fixed-ratio schedule on the center key. An optimal foraging model was tested in Experiments 1 and 2 by varying center-key travel time and number of baited feeders in baited patches. The ordinal predictions that number of feeders visited in empty patches would increase with travel time and decrease as number of baited feeders increased were supported, but pigeons visited far more feeders in empty patches than the optimal number predicted by the model to maximize energy/time. In Experiment 3, evidence was found to suggest that the number of empty feeders encountered before the first baited feeder in baited patches is an important factor controlling leaving empty patches.

Year:  1993        PMID: 16812688      PMCID: PMC1322045          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Choice, changeover, and travel.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, changeover, and travel: A quantitative model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; J G Fetterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; R Cicerone; T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and foraging.

Authors:  N Abarca; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Central-place foraging by Rattus norvegicus on a radial maze.

Authors:  M T Phelps; W A Roberts
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.231

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bayesian analysis of foraging by pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  P R Killeen; G M Palombo; L R Gottlob; J Beam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1996-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.