Literature DB >> 16811435

Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

A Silberberg, E Fantino.   

Abstract

Pigeons distribute their responses on concurrently available variable-interval schedules in the same proportion as reinforcements are distributed on the two schedules only when a changeover delay is used. The present study shows that this equality between proportions of responses and proportions of reinforcements ("matching") is obtained when the value of the changeover delay is varied. When responses are partitioned into the set of rapid response bursts occurring during the delay interval and the set of responses occurring subsequently, the proportion of neither set of responses matches the proportion of reinforcements. Instead, each set deviates from matching but in opposite directions. Matching on the gross level results from the interaction of two patterns evident in the local response rates: (I) the lengthening of the changeover delay response burst is accompanied by a commensurate decrease in the number of changeovers; (2) the changeover delay response burst is longer than the scheduled delay duration. When delay responses are eliminated by introducing a blackout during the delay interval, response matching is eliminated; the pigeon, however, continues to match the proportion of time spent responding on a key to the proportion of reinforcements obtained on that key.

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811435      PMCID: PMC1333760          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A RAPID PROCEDURE FOR GENERATING RANDOM REINFORCEMENT INTERVALS ON VI AND VR TAPES.

Authors:  E F SEGAL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  44 in total

1.  Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Travel time and concurrent-schedule choice: retrospective versus prospective control.

Authors:  M Davison; D Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.

Authors:  Christian U Krägeloh; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

7.  Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff; H M Reid
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Concurrent performances: rate constancies without changeover delays.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.