Literature DB >> 16812302

Choice, relative reinforcer duration, and the changeover ratio.

R M Dunn.   

Abstract

Relative reinforcer duration was varied in concurrent schedules with a fixed-ratio four changeover requirement. The schedule in effect after each reinforcer was randomly chosen. For all three pigeons, relative response rates overmatched relative reinforcer durations. Time allocation was less extreme and, on the average, matched relative reinforcer duration. In a subsequent manipulation, the level of preference was shown to depend on the size of the changeover requirement. These results are similar to those from related unequal reinforcement-frequency procedures.

Year:  1982        PMID: 16812302      PMCID: PMC1347870          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A RAPID PROCEDURE FOR GENERATING RANDOM REINFORCEMENT INTERVALS ON VI AND VR TAPES.

Authors:  E F SEGAL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performances.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

Authors:  E Fantino; N Squires; N Delbrück; C Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcement duration and the peak shift in post-discrimination gradients.

Authors:  R W Mariner; D R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding.

Authors:  J V Keller; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; R Cicerone; T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.

Authors:  R A Preston; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Shock intensity and signaled avoidance responding.

Authors:  D Das Graças De Souza; A B Alves De Moraes; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.

Authors:  W A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Matching, statistics, and common sense.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure.

Authors:  J C Todorov; E S Hanna; M C Bittencourt De Sá
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Timeout from concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.

Authors:  James E Mazur; Dawn R Biondi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Delay reduction: current status.

Authors:  E Fantino; R A Preston; R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.