Literature DB >> 16524007

Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.

Sarah J White1, Keith Rayner, Simon P Liversedge.   

Abstract

Henderson and Ferreira (1990) found that foveal load (manipulated via word frequency) modulates parafoveal processing, thereby affecting the amount of preview benefit obtained from the word to the right of fixation. The present experiment used the eye-contingent boundary paradigm and, consistent with Henderson and Ferreira, showed that foveal load modulated preview benefit for participants who were not aware of the display changes during reading. Also, for these participants, foveal load modulated preview benefit regardless of fixation durations on the foveal word. For participants who were aware of the display change, preview benefits occurred regardless of foveal processing difficulty. These results have important implications for understanding the way in which foveal load influences parafoveal processing during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16524007     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.

Authors:  W Schroyens; F Vitu; M Brysbaert; G d'Ydewalle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1999-11

2.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  E D Reichle; K Rayner; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea.

Authors:  A Toet; D M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

9.  Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important.

Authors:  L J Williams
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1988

10.  Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control.

Authors:  S M Kennison; C Clifton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  29 in total

1.  Eye movements and parafoveal word processing in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Miao-Hsuan Yen; Jie-Li Tsai; Ovid J-L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

2.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

Review 3.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

4.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Simon P Liversedge; Denis Drieghe; Hazel I Blythe; Holly S S L Joseph; Sarah J White; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-06

5.  Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; Erik D Reichle; Xingshan Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

8.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.