Literature DB >> 27576520

Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Martin R Vasilev1, Bernhard Angele2.   

Abstract

The use of gaze-contingent display techniques to study reading has shown that readers attend not only the currently fixated word, but also the word to the right of the current fixation. However, a critical look at the literature shows that a number of questions cannot be readily answered from the available literature reviews on the topic. First, there is no consensus as to whether readers also attend the second word to the right of fixation. Second, it is not clear whether parafoveal processing is more efficient in languages such as Chinese. Third, it is not well understood whether the measured effects are confounded by the properties of the parafoveal mask. In the present study, we addressed these issues by performing a Bayesian meta-analysis of 93 experiments that used the boundary paradigm (Rayner, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81. doi: 10.1016/0010-028590005-5 , 1975). We describe three main findings: (1) The advantage of previewing the second word to the right is modest in size and likely is not centered on zero; (2) Chinese readers do seem to make more efficient use of parafoveal processing, but this is mostly evident in gaze durations; and (3) there are interference effects associated with using different parafoveal masks that roughly increase when the mask is less word-like.

Keywords:  Eye movements; Parafoveal processing; Perceptual span; Preview benefit; Reading

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27576520     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1147-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  104 in total

1.  Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial?

Authors:  A W Inhoff; M Starr; K L Shindler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-10

2.  Early morphological effects in reading: evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew.

Authors:  Avital Deutsch; Ram Frost; Sharon Pelleg; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

3.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Michelle Lee; Michael Reiderman; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Is emotional content obtained from parafoveal words during reading? An eye movement analysis.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Tuomo Häikiö
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2005-12

5.  Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal.

Authors:  Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Eike M Richter; Hua Shu; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

7.  Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.

Authors:  Sarah Risse; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Parafoveal lexical activation depends on skilled reading proficiency.

Authors:  Aaron Veldre; Sally Andrews
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The meaning of significance in data testing.

Authors:  Jose D Perezgonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-27
View more
  14 in total

1.  Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Anna Marie Fennell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

2.  Event-related brain potentials reveal age-related changes in parafoveal-foveal integration during sentence processing.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The Inversion Effect for Chinese Characters is Modulated by Radical Organization.

Authors:  Canhuang Luo; Wei Chen; Ye Zhang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-06

4.  Auditory Distraction During Reading: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of a Continuing Controversy.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Julie A Kirkby; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-06-29

5.  Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Kayleigh L Warrington; Victoria A McGowan; Kevin B Paterson; Sarah J White
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.

Authors:  Chuanli Zang; Hong Du; Xuejun Bai; Guoli Yan; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04

8.  A co-registration investigation of inter-word spacing and parafoveal preview: Eye movements and fixation-related potentials.

Authors:  Federica Degno; Otto Loberg; Chuanli Zang; Manman Zhang; Nick Donnelly; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications.

Authors:  Olaf Dimigen; Benedikt V Ehinger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.

Authors:  Federica Degno; Otto Loberg; Chuanli Zang; Manman Zhang; Nick Donnelly; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.