Literature DB >> 17853202

Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Denis Drieghe1, Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek.   

Abstract

Contrasting predictions of serial and parallel views on the processing of foveal and parafoveal information during reading were tested. A high-frequency adjective (young) was followed by either a high-frequency word(n) (child) or a low-frequency word(n) (tenor), which in turn was followed by either a correct (performing) or an orthographic illegal word(n+1) (pxvforming) as a parafoveal preview. A limited parafoveal-on-foveal effect was observed: There were inflated fixation times on word(n) when the preview of word(n+1) was orthographically illegal. However, this parafoveal-on-foveal effect was (a) independent of the frequency of word(n), (b) restricted to those instances when the eyes were very close to word(n+1), and (c) associated with relatively long prior saccades. These observations are all compatible with a mislocated fixation account in which parafoveal-on-foveal effects result from saccadic undershoots of word(n+1) and with a serial model of eye movement control during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17853202      PMCID: PMC2662923          DOI: 10.1080/17470210701467953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  19 in total

1.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Marc Brysbaert; Timothy Desmet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  36 in total

1.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Simon P Liversedge; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Foveal processing and word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

5.  Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Erik D Reichle; Debra Machacek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

7.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14

8.  Investigating the Use of World Knowledge During On-line Comprehension in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Philippa L Howard; Simon P Liversedge; Valerie Benson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-07

9.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The word grouping hypothesis and eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Alexander Pollatsek; Adrian Staub; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.