Literature DB >> 24347813

Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English.

Elizabeth R Schotter1.   

Abstract

While orthographic and phonological preview benefits in reading are uncontroversial (see Schotter, Angele, & Rayner, 2012 for a review), researchers have debated the existence of semantic preview benefit with positive evidence in Chinese and German, but no support in English. Two experiments, using the gazecontingent boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975), show that semantic preview benefit can be observed in English when the preview and target are synonyms (share the same or highly similar meaning, e.g., curlers-rollers). However, no semantic preview benefit was observed for semantic associates (e.g., curlers-styling). These different preview conditions represent different degrees to which the meaning of the sentence changes when the preview is replaced by the target. When this continuous variable (determined by a norming procedure) was used as the predictor in the analyses, there was a significant relationship between it and all reading time measures, suggesting that similarity in meaning between what is accessed parafoveally and what is processed foveally may be an important influence on the presence of semantic preview benefit. Why synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in reading English is discussed in relation to (1) previous failures to find semantic preview benefit in English and (2) the fact that semantic preview benefit is observed in other languages even for non-synonymous words. Semantic preview benefit is argued to depend on several factors-attentional resources, depth of orthography, and degree of similarity between preview and target.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24347813      PMCID: PMC3859233          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  36 in total

Review 1.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

4.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

5.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

7.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?

Authors:  G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

8.  Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities.

Authors:  M R Quillian
Journal:  Behav Sci       Date:  1967-09

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more
  28 in total

1.  The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Michelle Lee; Michael Reiderman; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alex L White; John Palmer; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-07

3.  Cross-language parafoveal semantic processing: Evidence from Korean-Chinese bilinguals.

Authors:  Aiping Wang; Junmo Yeon; Wei Zhou; Hua Shu; Ming Yan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

4.  Parafoveal activation of sign translation previews among deaf readers during the reading of Chinese sentences.

Authors:  Jinger Pan; Hua Shu; Yuling Wang; Ming Yan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

5.  On the Eye Movement Control of Changing Reading Direction for a Single Word: The Case of Reading Numerals in Urdu.

Authors:  Azizuddin Khan; Otto Loberg; Jarkko Hautala
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-10

6.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Nan Li; Suiping Wang; Timothy J Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.

Authors:  Aaron Veldre; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

Review 9.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

10.  Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics.

Authors:  Ming Yan; Jinger Pan; Nathalie N Bélanger; Hua Shu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.