Literature DB >> 7876774

Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control.

S M Kennison1, C Clifton.   

Abstract

The experiment in this article extended studies by A. W. Inhoff and K. Rayner (1986) and J. M. Henderson and F. Ferreira (1990) to determine how the printed frequency of two adjacent words influenced the benefit of having parafoveal preview of the 2nd word. High- and low-span participants (assessed by M. Daneman and P. A. Carpenter's, 1980, Reading Span Test) were tested to determine whether working memory capacity influenced parafoveal preview benefit. Parafoveal preview benefit was determined by an interaction of both words' frequencies in first fixation and by the 2nd word's frequency in gaze duration. However, readers were generally fixated closer to the beginning of the 2nd word when the 1st word was low frequency. When the viewing distance confound was minimized, the prior word's frequency did affect parafoveal preview benefit. Parafoveal preview benefit did not vary between reading groups. Group distributions of fixation duration provided no evidence for J. M. Henderson and F. Ferreira's fixation cutoff model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7876774     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.1.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  34 in total

Review 1.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Raymond Bertram; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

2.  LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

4.  Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Erik D Reichle; Debra Machacek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Jamie Reilly; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

6.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

7.  Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Lexical processing during saccades in text comprehension.

Authors:  Kiyomi Yatabe; Martin J Pickering; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Effects of syntactic context on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Diana Bocianski
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.