Literature DB >> 24058229

Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.

Erik D Reichle1, Simon P Liversedge, Denis Drieghe, Hazel I Blythe, Holly S S L Joseph, Sarah J White, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Compared to skilled adult readers, children typically make more fixations that are longer in duration, shorter saccades, and more regressions, thus reading more slowly (Blythe & Joseph, 2011). Recent attempts to understand the reasons for these differences have discovered some similarities (e.g., children and adults target their saccades similarly; Joseph, Liversedge, Blythe, White, & Rayner, 2009) and some differences (e.g., children's fixation durations are more affected by lexical variables; Blythe, Liversedge, Joseph, White, & Rayner, 2009) that have yet to be explained. In this article, the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading (Reichle, 2011; Reichle, Pollatsek, Fisher, & Rayner, 1998) is used to simulate various eye-movement phenomena in adults vs. children in order to evaluate hypotheses about the concurrent development of reading skill and eye-movement behavior. These simulations suggest that the primary difference between children and adults is their rate of lexical processing, and that different rates of (post-lexical) language processing may also contribute to some phenomena (e.g., children's slower detection of semantic anomalies; Joseph et al., 2008). The theoretical implications of this hypothesis are discussed, including possible alternative accounts of these developmental changes, how reading skill and eye movements change across the entire lifespan (e.g., college-aged vs. older readers), and individual differences in reading ability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer model; E-Z Reader; Eye movements; Lexical access; Reading; Reading skill

Year:  2013        PMID: 24058229      PMCID: PMC3774954          DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Rev        ISSN: 0273-2297


  92 in total

1.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  E D Reichle; K Rayner; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm.

Authors:  Tuomo Häikiö; Raymond Bertram; Jukka Hyönä; Pekka Niemi
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-06-05

6.  Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Natasha Tokowicz; Ying Liu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Reading without a fovea.

Authors:  K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-10-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements. I. Age-related changes in normal children.

Authors:  J Fukushima; T Hatta; K Fukushima
Journal:  Brain Dev       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.961

10.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: the importance of the word to the right of fixation.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge; Sarah J White
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  19 in total

1.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

2.  The "risky" reading strategy revisited: New simulations using E-Z Reader.

Authors:  Victoria A McGowan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Neurophysiological, Oculomotor, and Computational Modeling of Impaired Reading Ability in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Elisa C Dias; Heather Sheridan; Antígona Martínez; Pejman Sehatpour; Gail Silipo; Stephanie Rohrig; Ayelet Hochman; Pamela D Butler; Matthew J Hoptman; Nadine Revheim; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Contributions of reader- and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Kazunaga Matsuki; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The Random Forests statistical technique: An examination of its value for the study of reading.

Authors:  Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-05

6.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

7.  Online inference making and comprehension monitoring in children during reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Holly Joseph; Elizabeth Wonnacott; Kate Nation
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Children's and adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences during reading.

Authors:  Holly S S L Joseph; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eye Movement Patterns in Natural Reading: A Comparison of Monolingual and Bilingual Reading of a Novel.

Authors:  Uschi Cop; Denis Drieghe; Wouter Duyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A similar correction mechanism in slow and fluent readers after suboptimal landing positions.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.