Literature DB >> 23106372

Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.

Wonil Choi1, Peter C Gordon.   

Abstract

The coordination of word-recognition and oculomotor processes during reading was evaluated in eye-tracking experiments that examined how word skipping, where a word is not fixated during first-pass reading, is affected by the lexical status of a letter string in the parafovea and ease of recognizing that string. Ease of lexical recognition was manipulated through target-word frequency (Experiment 1) and through repetition priming between prime-target pairs embedded in a sentence (Experiment 2). Using the gaze-contingent boundary technique the target word appeared in the parafovea either with full preview or with transposed-letter (TL) preview. The TL preview strings were nonwords in Experiment 1 (e.g., bilnk created from the target blink), but were words in Experiment 2 (e.g., sacred created from the target scared). Experiment 1 showed greater skipping for high-frequency than low-frequency target words in the full preview condition, but not in the TL preview (nonword) condition. Experiment 2 showed greater skipping for target words that repeated an earlier prime word than for those that did not, with this repetition priming occurring both with preview of the full target and with preview of the target's TL neighbor word. However, time to progress from the word after the target was greater following skips of the TL preview word, whose meaning was anomalous in the sentence context, than following skips of the full preview word whose meaning fit sensibly into the sentence context. Together, the results support the idea that coordination between word-recognition and oculomotor processes occurs at the level of implicit lexical decisions. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23106372      PMCID: PMC3634888          DOI: 10.1037/a0030432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  49 in total

1.  Eye movements and processing stages in reading: relative contribution of visual, lexical, and contextual factors.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Enrique Meseguer
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.264

2.  Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements.

Authors:  Scott A McDonald; Richard C Shillcock
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

6.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination.

Authors:  Sarah J White; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: 'casual' or 'causal'?

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Nicola Molinaro; Itziar Laka; Adelina Estévez; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

9.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.

Authors:  S D Lima; A W Inhoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Renske S Hoedemaker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Print exposure modulates the effects of repetition priming during sentence reading.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

5.  Word recognition during reading: the interaction between lexical repetition and frequency.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

6.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

8.  The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Abby E Laishley; Keith Rayner; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.

Authors:  Chuanli Zang; Hong Du; Xuejun Bai; Guoli Yan; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.051

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.