Literature DB >> 16012705

Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Peter J Blamey1.   

Abstract

Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) is an amplification strategy that uses digital signal processing techniques to improve the audibility, comfort, and intelligibility of sounds for people who use cochlear implants and/or hearing aids. The strategy uses statistical analysis to select the most information-rich section of the input dynamic range in multiple-frequency channels. Fuzzy logic rules control the gain in each frequency channel so that the selected section of the dynamic range is presented at an audible and comfortable level. The ADRO processing thus adaptively optimizes the dynamic range of the signal in multiple-frequency channels. Clinical studies show that ADRO can be fitted easily to all degrees of hearing loss for hearing aids and cochlear implants in a direct and intuitive manner, taking the preferences of the listener into account. The result is high acceptance by new and experienced hearing aid users and strong preferences for ADRO compared with alternative amplification strategies. The ADRO processing is particularly well suited to bimodal and hybrid stimulation which combine electric and acoustic stimulation in opposite ears or in the same ear, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16012705      PMCID: PMC4111489          DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  33 in total

1.  Growth of loudness in listeners with cochlear hearing losses: recruitment reconsidered.

Authors:  Søren Buus; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say?

Authors:  Lena L N Wong; Louise Hickson; Bradley McPherson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

5.  A digital processing strategy to optimize hearing aid outputs directly.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey; Lois F A Martin; Hayley J Fiket
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.

Authors:  P J Blamey; J Z Sarant; L E Paatsch; J G Barry; C P Bow; R J Wales; M Wright; C Psarros; K Rattigan; R Tooher
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices.

Authors:  L E Cornelisse; R C Seewald; D G Jamieson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality.

Authors:  A C Neuman; M H Bakke; C Mackersie; S Hellman; H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant.

Authors:  Y C Tong; P J Blamey; R C Dowell; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  27 in total

1.  Designing of a digital behind-the-ear hearing aid to meet the World Health Organization requirements.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Silvio Pires Penteado
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  The development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear implant system.

Authors:  James F Patrick; Peter A Busby; Peter J Gibson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

Review 3.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

4.  The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Bernadette Rakszawski; Rose Wright; Jamie H Cadieux; Lisa S Davidson; Christine Brenner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  From the editor.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-03

6.  Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Isabelle Mosnier; Mathieu Marx; Frederic Venail; Natalie Loundon; Samantha Roux-Vaillard; Olivier Sterkers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Oldooz Hazrati; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children.

Authors:  Shubha Tak; Asha Yathiraj
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.

Authors:  T Y C Ching; E van Wanrooy; H Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.