Literature DB >> 23053370

The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Mohammad Alfelasi1, Jean Pierre Piron, Caroline Mathiolon, Nadjmah Lenel, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel, Frederic Venail.   

Abstract

Transtympanic promontory stimulation test (TPST) has been suggested to be a useful tool in predicting postoperative outcomes in patients at risk of poor auditory neuron functioning, especially after a long auditory deprivation. However, only sparse data are available on this topic. This study aimed at showing correlations between the auditory nerve dynamic range, evaluated by TPST, the electrical dynamic range of the cochlear implant and speech perception outcome. We evaluated 65 patients with postlingual hearing loss and no residual hearing, implanted with a Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant device for at least 2 years and with a minimum of 17 active electrodes. Using the TPST, we measured the threshold for auditory perception (T-level) and the maximum acceptable level of stimulation (M-level) at stimulation frequencies of 50, 100 and 200 Hz. General linear regression was performed to correlate 1/speech perception, evaluated using the PBK test 1 year after surgery, and 2/cochlear implant electrical dynamic range, with the age at time of implantation, the duration of auditory deprivation, the etiology of the deafness, the duration of cochlear implant use and auditory nerve dynamic range. Postoperative speech perception outcome correlated with etiology, duration of auditory deprivation and implant use, and TPST at 100 and 200 Hz. The dynamic range of the cochlear implant map correlated with duration of auditory deprivation, speech perception outcome at 6 months and TPST at 100 and 200 Hz. TPST test can be used to predict functional outcome after cochlear implant surgery in difficult cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053370     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2125-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  32 in total

1.  Effects of pulse rate on threshold and dynamic range in Clarion cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Gail S Donaldson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Brenda D Gotter; Michael J Strube; Chris A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults.

Authors:  K M J Green; Y M Bhatt; D J Mawman; M P O'Driscoll; S R Saeed; R T Ramsden; M W Green
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2007-03

4.  Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Jong Cheol Lee; Myung Hoon Yoo; Joong Ho Ahn; Kwang-Sun Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The role of the promontory stimulation test in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Samuel C L Kuo; William P R Gibson
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2002-03

6.  Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.

Authors:  Adam Walkowiak; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Bozena Kostek; Henryk Skarzynski; Agata Szkielkowska; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 7.  Prognostic indicators in paediatric cochlear implant surgery: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Jane Black; Louise Hickson; Bruce Black; Chris Perry
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-05

8.  Relations between audiometrical thresholds of potential cochlear implant patients and their performance in preoperative psycho-physical tests with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J P Brokx; G Hombergen; F Coninx
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1988

9.  Effects of preoperative electrical stimulability and historical factors on performance with multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  P R Kileny; S Zimmerman-Phillips; J L Kemink; S P Schmaltz
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  The effect of instantaneous input dynamic range setting on the speech perception of children with the nucleus 24 implant.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Margaret W Skinner; Beth A Holstad; Beverly T Fears; Marie K Richter; Margaret Matusofsky; Christine Brenner; Timothy Holden; Amy Birath; Jerrica L Kettel; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  6 in total

1.  The 'full-blown' MRI of sudden hearing loss: 3D FLAIR in a patient with bilateral metastases in the internal auditory canals.

Authors:  Giorgio Conte; Federica Di Berardino; Diego Zanetti; Sabrina Avignone; Clara Sina; Elisabetta Iofrida; Fabio Triulzi
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2017-10-19

2.  Variability of word discrimination scores in clinical practice and consequences on their sensitivity to hearing loss.

Authors:  Annie Moulin; André Bernard; Laurent Tordella; Judith Vergne; Annie Gisbert; Christian Martin; Céline Richard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Cochlear implantation for hearing rehabilitation in single-sided deafness after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Susan Arndt; Antje Aschendorff; Roland Laszig; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Matthew Robert Bartindale; Kent Sean Tadokoro; Matthew Lowell Kircher
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-08

Review 5.  Central plasticity and dysfunction elicited by aural deprivation in the critical period.

Authors:  Zhiji Chen; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Temporal Bone Trauma: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Michael Eastwood; Kirsty Biggs; Chris Metcalfe; Jameel Muzaffar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.