Literature DB >> 17709573

Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.

T Y C Ching1, E van Wanrooy, H Dillon.   

Abstract

There are now many recipients of unilateral cochlear implants who have usable residual hearing in the non-implanted ear. To avoid auditory deprivation and to provide binaural hearing, a hearing aid or a second cochlear implant can be fitted to that ear. This article addresses the question of whether better binaural hearing can be achieved with binaural/bimodal fitting (combining a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears) or bilateral implantation. In the first part of this article, the rationale for providing binaural hearing is examined. In the second part, the literature on the relative efficacy of binaural/bimodal fitting and bilateral implantation is reviewed. Most studies on comparing either mode of bilateral stimulation with unilateral implantation reported some binaural benefits in some test conditions on average but revealed that some individuals benefited, whereas others did not. There were no controlled comparisons between binaural/bimodal fitting and bilateral implantation and no evidence to support the efficacy of one mode over the other. In the third part of the article, a crossover trial of two adults who had binaural/bimodal fitting and who subsequently received a second implant is reported. The findings at 6 and 12 months after they received their second implant indicated that binaural function developed over time, and the extent of benefit depended on which abilities were assessed for the individual. In the fourth and final parts of the article, clinical issues relating to candidacy for binaural/ bimodal fitting and strategies for bimodal fitting are discussed with implications for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17709573      PMCID: PMC4111363          DOI: 10.1177/1084713807304357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  99 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Models of plasticity in spatial auditory processing.

Authors:  B Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.

Authors:  P J Blamey; J Z Sarant; L E Paatsch; J G Barry; C P Bow; R J Wales; M Wright; C Psarros; K Rattigan; R Tooher
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  K Gfeller; C R Lansing
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-08

6.  Effects of acclimatization and deprivation on non-speech auditory abilities.

Authors:  D Byrne; D Dirks
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Performance in children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: bilateral stimulation and binaural hearing.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Emma van Wanrooy; Mandy Hill; Paula Incerti
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  T Y Ching; H Dillon; R Katsch; D Byrne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.

Authors:  R J van Hoesel; Y C Tong; R D Hollow; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J B Nadol; Y S Young; R J Glynn
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  69 in total

1.  Current research with cochlear implants at Arizona State University.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Anthony Spahr; Rene H Gifford; Sarah Cook; Ting Zhang; Louise Loiselle; William Yost; Lara Cardy; JoAnne Whittingham; David Schramm
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Speech recognition performance in children with cochlear implants using bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  S B Rathna Kumar; P Mohanty; S G R Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-05

3.  Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Jennifer R Fowler; Jessica L Eggleston; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Perception of consonants in reverberation and noise by adults fitted with bimodal devices.

Authors:  Michelle Mason; Kostas Kokkinakis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Effect of Cochlear Implant Interval on Spoken Language Skills of Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Kaitlyn A Wenrich; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Cochlear implantation in nontraditional candidates: preliminary results in adolescents with asymmetric hearing loss.

Authors:  Jamie H Cadieux; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.